High Sugar Plus Low Dopamine Could Hasten Diabetes and Obesity

Imbalance may prompt people to eat more

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Too much sugar can lead to weight gain. But for certain people, poor production of the hormone dopamine in their brain might also promote overeating, pushing them toward diabetes and obesity. The finding complements the latest understandingof how foods high in sugar and fat can hijack the brain’s reward system, motivating people to overeat.

A study published in June 2013 compared individuals whose cells process insulin normally with other subjects whose cells resist insulin. Insulin controls how glucose is delivered into cells, giving them energy. Subjects who were insulin-resistant produced a lower amount of dopamine after drinking a sugary beverage than individuals who process insulin normally. Brain scans showed that both groups of people had similar numbers of dopamine receptors in cells in their brain reward centers, which ruled out lower uptake of dopamine as a potential factor.

The reward centers help motivate people to seek foods high in sugar and fat. Insulin resistance in association with less dopamine in those reward centers might cause people to overeat, to compensate for obtaining a lesser sense of satisfaction from eating sugary food, according to the study’s lead researcher, Gene-Jack Wang, professor of radiology at Stony Brook University and a researcher at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, N.Y.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Medical complications can arise when cells resist the uptake of insulin; in response, the body produces more insulin while glucose levels are high in the blood stream. That pairing is a major contributor to metabolic syndrome, a precursor to diabetes that also often accompanies obesity.

Previous studies have shown similar effects in mice, but Wang says his study is the first to reveal them in humans. Only 19 people participated in his trial, but if larger studies confirm the mechanism, Wang says medication could possibly be developed to help insulin-resistant people counteract their low output of dopamine.

 

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 3This article was published with the title “High Sugar Plus Low Dopamine Could Hasten Diabetes and Obesity” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 3 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican092013-1EucYdKuj6vdVQKlIgKDJo

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe