Lung Cancer

New vaccine against the deadliest of all cancers teaches the body to defend itself while avoiding the side effects of more traditional therapies

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Treatment: Stimuvax Maker: Biomira/Merck KGaA Stage: Phase III expected to begin December 2006.

Why It Matters

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States for both men and women. It is more lethal than the next three most common cancers combined (colon, breast and prostate) and will kill 160,000 people in the United States in this year alone.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


How It Works

Stimuvax is designed to vaccinate the body against Nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for about 80 percent of all cases. The vaccine works by inciting the immune system to attack cancer cells. It consists of a snippet of a cell surface protein called MUC-1, which has been linked to cancer. This protein is displayed with a bacterial cell wall component on fat droplets known as liposomes, which are believed to enhance immune recognition of cancer proteins. "It's relatively nontoxic and doesn't have the side effects of more traditional forms of therapy," says Biomira president and CEO Robert Kirkman.

Results from its phase IIb study revealed the median survival rate for patients with stage IIIB NSCLC, who have cancers too large to surgically remove, was 30.6 months when given Stimuvax versus 13.3 months for patients who received only a placebo.

Return to Special Report: 10 Promising Treatments for World's Biggest Health Threats

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe