New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

May 2026: Science history from 50, 100 and 150 years ago

Synchronous fireflies; Grand Canyon fossil footprints

Historical photo of King Tut's coffin.

1926, King Tut's Golden Coffins: "Within the burial chamber hewn from the solid rock, Tut-ankh-amen’s mummy was protected by many enclosures of wood, stone and gold. First came three large wooden, box-like shrines, one within the other. These were removed to reveal a great sarcophagus of yellow quartzite with a granite lid."

Scientific American, Vol. 134, No. 5; May 1926

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

1976

Synchronous Fireflies

“Many of the familiar fireflies that flit over our lawns in summer are called roving fireflies because the males fly about singly, searching for females perched in low vegetation. The male flashes rhythmically, and when a female flashes in response, the two fireflies begin a courtship involving a series of alternating flashes that lead the male to the female. For 300 years explorers and naturalists have reported another kind of firefly behavior, seen in the region stretching from India to the Philippines and New Guinea. There the fireflies gather in trees in dense swarms, and the males flash on and off in the same rhythm.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Observers have marveled at the beauty of the synchronous flashing, but beauty alone does not explain the persistent fascination of the displays. What has been irresistible to many are the questions of how and why. How is it possible for thousands of fireflies to coordinate their flashing so exactly, cycle after cycle, and why do they do it? We hope to show that the questions are linked, in the sense that one cannot understand the why of synchronous flashing without understanding the how.”

1926

Nature Faking

“When the late Theodore Roosevelt directed a well-aimed and perfectly logical blow at ‘nature faking,’ he rendered to popular natural science one of the most distinct services. But this sort of warfare must be continued, for the nature fakers still exist in growing numbers. Even the renowned Jean-Henri Fabre, who has been more lauded and quoted than any other nature writer of a foreign country, could not refrain from errors due to supposition and incomplete observation, one of which—namely, the intended puncture of the central ganglia of spiders by the captor wasp for the purpose of paralyzing—has been shown to be a fallacy. These cases, however, in which the carefully investigating naturalists are remiss, come from closely related facts and are not born entirely of the desire to relate wonders and unheard-of things.”

Read more about popular fallacies—such as birds being charmed by snakes—that grew out of pseudo-scientific nature lore in the May 1926 issue.

Fossil Footprints from the Grand Canyon

“Tracks of extinct animals, at least 25,000,000 years old, have been discovered in the Grand Canyon of the Colorado River. They are so remarkably well preserved that they have been prepared as a permanent exhibit on the Hermit Trail in the Canyon, to teach a lesson as to the great antiquity of the animal life that once roamed over these ancient sands millions of years before the Colorado River had excavated the deep canyon in which it now flows. The fossils of the Hermit Trail occur in a fine-grained sandstone of Permian age, the period after the Carboniferous or principal coal-forming period.

“One of the sandstone slabs that was excavated bears footprints of a new species; the creature was apparently a short, squat quadruped with a wide body and was evidently slow of movement, as indicated by the short stride.”

1876

Reclaiming the Steppes

“In the Russian empire lies an immense basin, depressed below the level of the ocean. This basin holds the Caspian Sea, and into it also flow the great rivers Ural and Volga, which drain a large portion of central Russia. Over the ages, the rivers have carried down soil and formed vast deposits which have encroached upon the sea, contracting its dimensions and elevating its bottom so that large vessels can no longer traverse it.

“As the sea diminished in size, so did the supply of watery vapor in the adjacent atmosphere; with less moisture, the land nearby has gradually changed into a desert. To reclaim this desert and restore it to its former state of fertility is the object of a gigantic engineering project that involves the connection of the Caspian with the Black Sea by means of a canal. The lead engineer estimates that in 40 years the levels of the two seas would be so nearly the same that the channel between them would be navigable and the fertile system would appear once more.”

Three archival covers of Scientific American from May 1976, 1926 and 1876.

Jeanna Bryner is editor in chief of Scientific American. Previously she was editor in chief of Live Science and, prior to that, an editor at Scholastic's Science World magazine. Bryner has an English degree from Salisbury University, a master’s degree in biogeochemistry and environmental sciences from the University of Maryland and a graduate science journalism degree from New York University. She has worked as a biologist in Florida, where she monitored wetlands and did field surveys for endangered species, including the gorgeous Florida Scrub Jay. She also received an ocean sciences journalism fellowship from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. She is a firm believer that science is for everyone and that just about everything can be viewed through the lens of science.

More by Jeanna Bryner
Scientific American Magazine Vol 334 Issue 5This article was published with the title “50, 100 & 150 Years” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 334 No. 5 (), p. 96
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican052026-21eHgEf97YSEP2FX60qI1t

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe