Mexico Looks to Curb Carbon with a New Cap-and-Trade System

Mexico's stock market has begun trading simulated emissions permits

In January protesters in Mexico took to the streets to express their anger at the gasoline price hike, or gasolinazo (1). Demonstrators set fire to a truck in Mexico City in protest of a price hike in 2009 (2).

Alfredo Estrella Getty Images (protest); David de la Paz Redux Pictures (burning truck)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Mexico kicked off 2017 with a 20 percent spike in gasoline prices, driven in part by the phasing out of subsidies. Some consumers set fires at gas stations—a response that highlights the backlash countries can face as they stop subsidizing carbon-based fuels and start encouraging climate-friendly alternatives. Now the Mexican government and stock market are experimenting with a gentler tool for discouraging carbon emissions: cap-and-trade. Mexico, which in 2012 passed the developing world's first climate law, is well placed to set an example for other developing economies looking to shrink their carbon footprints.

In cap-and-trade programs, regulators issue permits allowing companies to pollute a certain amount. In most systems, the cap gets lower over time, giving businesses a choice: slash emissions further or buy permits on the market from another company.

More than 80 Mexican companies are signed up to simulate permit trading. Using software developed by an organization within the Mexican Stock Exchange—MÉXICO2—companies are familiarizing themselves with the everyday logistics of carbon trading, says MÉXICO2 research analyst Andrés Prieto. By late 2018 the federal government will require Mexico's biggest emitters to participate.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The nation has a cooperation agreement with California, which already trades carbon permits with several Canadian provinces. For now Mexico is learning from its North American neighbors' experience and may eventually join that market. “The very big lesson we learned in California, in comparison with Europe, is that it is not enough to have certainty about the emissions quantity,” Prieto says. Polluters also want a forecast for permit prices. In Europe's market, price volatility discouraged companies from making long-term investments in reducing their environmental footprint, despite a steadily lowering carbon cap. Mexico may also require a minimum price for carbon emission permits, as California does, so companies can better predict their future financial positions.

Mexico has no shortage of polluting industries—so progress in cutting emissions is within reach if the country can build up the capacity to regulate them, says economist Juan-Carlos Altamirano of the World Resources Institute in Washington, D.C.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe