New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Microbes May Once Have Breathed Rocket Fuel

Newly discovered microbes breathe rocket fuel

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The energetic molecule perchlorate is rocket fuel and, it turns out, food for an ancient kind of life. A team of Dutch researchers show in the April 5 Science that the earthly archaeon—as the name implies, an old type of microbe distinct from bacteria—can grow quite happily on perchlorate. Archaeoglobus fulgidus (shown at right) takes the perchlorate in, gains energy by transforming it into highly reactive chlorite and moves on. Thriving in volcanic vents underneath the sea as well as other superhot areas of Earth, such as oil reservoirs or places where hot rock turns water to steam, A. fulgidus and other microbes like it might be the reason there is not more rocket fuel lying around on our planet.

This is the first archaeon known to feed on perchlorate, but it is not the first microbe found to do so. Some bacteria can manage the same trick and even produce a special enzyme to help them rapidly break down the resulting chlorite, which is otherwise damaging to cells, producing oxygen as a by-product. A. fulgidus, which cannot tolerate oxygen, uses a different chemistry to break down the chlorite: it relies on sulfur compounds that are naturally present in its environment—a symbiotic relation that exists between life and nonlife chemistries.

A. fulgidus may in fact be a primeval form of life on Earth, having evolved before photosynthesis. Once algae caused the presence of oxygen in the atmosphere to rise, the ancestors of A. fulgidus would have had to escape to dark, deep, hot places of the globe. Deposits of perchlorate have also been found wherever robots look on Mars. Does this mean the substance, poisonous to humans, serves as lunch for some Martian microbe?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The prospect is not out of the question. The surface of Mars is certainly too cold for this bug to survive, which may explain why there is so much rocket fuel lying around. But the discovery of the microbe raises the odds that some other life-form on the Red Planet lives deep below the perchlorate-bearing surface.

David Biello is a contributing editor at Scientific American.

More by David Biello
Scientific American Magazine Vol 308 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Running on Poison” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 308 No. 6 (), p. 30
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0613-30

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe