New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Mobile Health Fails a Checkup

Mobile health care may be falling short

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The promise of using text messages, video or smartphone apps to improve health care has attracted a lot of attention and dollars. Yet mobile health, also known as mHealth, is still in its infancy, and a pair of new analyses shows that it has garnered mixed results. Of 75 controlled trials in which patients used mobile technology to manage a disease or adopt healthier behaviors, only three showed reliable signs of success, according to a review article published in January in PLOS Medicine.

In an accompanying review, the same authors looked at the use of mobile technology to improve health care delivery, such as using text messages to remind patients about appointments, and found that 11 of 42 trials had positive results.

Physician Rahul Chakrabarti of the University of Melbourne in Australia, co–editor in chief of the Journal of Mobile Technology in Medicine, calls the reviews the most comprehensive meta-analysis of mHealth evidence to date.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The limitations of today's mHealth treatments should not discourage researchers, says epidemiologist Caroline Free of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who led the analysis. People can learn from interventions that did work. For instance, receiving text messages helped smokers quit in one trial that verified its results with biochemical tests. In the only successful patient-intervention trial in the developing world, in Kenya, text message reminders to take antiretroviral drugs helped to reduce HIV virus counts.

The bad news is that most trials had weak designs, with many failing to randomize participants in the control group and the experimental group. Others relied on participants to self-report the results, even though such methods can be unreliable. Most trials also neglected the developing world, where mobile phones have the most potential to improve access to health care.

Chakrabarti, who was not involved in the research, says that the studies show “there is a clear need for improved methodology.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe