New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

More Immigrants, Bigger Smiles and Frowns

People are more likely to wear their emotions on their sleeves in countries with a strong history of immigration 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Psychologist Paula Niedenthal was rereading The Little House on the Prairie series five years ago when a question came to mind: On the U.S.'s plains in the 1800s, how did the mix of cultures affect how people expressed their emotions? From demonstrative Italians to reticent Swedes, a variety of immigrant groups had to communicate during farming and trading. She wondered whether the long history of migration in the nation has influenced the way we show our feelings.

In 2011 Niedenthal found the data she needed to answer that question—the number of cultures migrating to various countries during the past 500 years—in a paper written by two economists at Brown University. Using those data, Niedenthal and her graduate students at the University of Wisconsin–Madison recently published two papers demonstrating that people from heterogeneous cultures—those with more historical immigration—display more easily recognized emotions than those from homogeneous cultures.

“If you share language and culture, you don't need to be emotionally expressive,” Niedenthal says. If you do not have that common background, you would want your emotions to be obvious and get your point across.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In one of the papers to come out of Niedenthal's group, published in 2015 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, first author Magdalena Rychlowska and her co-authors had 726 people from nine countries complete a questionnaire about how they react to different facial expressions. The researchers found that those from more historically heterogeneous cultures tend to see a smile as a good reason to be friendly or get close to someone. Those from homogeneous cultures, however, more often saw a smile as a way to demonstrate superiority. “Smiles are basically like languages—you use them in different ways,” says Rychlowska, now at Cardiff University in Wales.

Expanding on that research, Adrienne Wood, a current Ph.D. candidate in Niedenthal's lab, gathered existing data on emotion recognition from 92 papers representing 82 cultures. She looked at how often subjects attributed the correct emotion to a photograph, video or audio recording and compared that with the historical heterogeneity in the expresser's country. She found that people from cultures with higher rates of immigration display more recognizable facial expressions and vocal cues. “Cultures evolve to address the particular challenges of their social and ecological environments,” says Wood, whose study was published this past January in Emotion.

The researchers hope to investigate more census data soon, which may reveal how long it takes a heterogeneous population of people to shift the way they emote. “A long history of migration changes the whole culture,” Niedenthal says.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe