Munching Bugs Gave the First Mammals an Edge

Early mammals got ahead by eating insects

Morganucodon illustration

An illustration of Morganucodon, an extinct genus of cynodont. This small, insectivorous, mammal-like animal lived from the end of the Late Triassic to the Middle Jurassic. Morganucodon was around 10 centimeters long. Cynodonts included the animals that later evolved into mammals.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

More than 220 million years ago, as early dinosaurs were just getting their legs under them, the first mammals evolved from a group of tiny, weasel-like reptiles called cynodonts. New research hints that mammals' huge success later on may be linked to a surprisingly small dietary choice: insects.

As cynodonts evolved into early mammals, they developed fewer teeth and skull bones. Paleontologists had long assumed these simplifications allowed for stronger skulls and multiple tooth types, letting mammals benefit from a greater variety of foods. Yet no one knew exactly what drove these changes, and now a study in Communications Biology has added a new facet to the story.

“The transition from cynodonts to mammals is a textbook example of repurposing existing skeletal elements,” says lead author Stephan Lautenschlager, a paleontologist at the University of Birmingham in England. In their study, Lautenschlager and his colleagues used digital models and biomechanical tests to investigate how the simpler early-mammal skulls held up to biting stresses. Rather than finding increased efficiency or stress resistance in general, they learned that the stress of simulated bites decreased across the top of the skull but increased along the cheek. The specific patterns, and the earliest mammals' relatively small size, are reminiscent of modern small insectivores—which use quick bites and a dental tool kit of puncturing and crushing teeth to bust through arthropod carapaces.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“These findings suggest the patterns we see in the evolution of mammal skulls are more nuanced than we might have thought,” says Oxford University Museum of Natural History paleontologist Elsa Panciroli, who was not involved in the new research. “This study gives us fresh data to start getting closer to the answers.”

The insect-munching specialists' anatomical changes set the stage for mammal evolution through to today, the researchers say. The changes provided a foundation for later adaptations to feed on plants and larger animals; over time these pioneers became the Mesozoic equivalents of otters, raccoons, flying squirrels and aardvarks. “It's not about how hard you can bite,” Panciroli says, “but perhaps about the different ways in which you can bite and chew.”

Riley Black, who formerly wrote under the name Brian Switek, is the author of Skeleton Keys and My Beloved Brontosaurus. She lives in Salt Lake City, Utah. Follow her on Twitter @Laelaps and on Instagram @laelaps

More by Riley Black
Scientific American Magazine Vol 329 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Munching Bugs” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 329 No. 1 (), p. 11
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0723-11

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe