New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

NASA reveals new problem with Artemis II rocket, further delaying launch

Just a day after NASA set a March 6 target date for its upcoming moon mission, the agency’s head announced it will roll back Artemis II’s rocket from the pad entirely

Artemis II with the moon in background

NASA/Sam Lott

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Just a day after NASA announced it was on track to launch its upcoming moon mission, Artemis II, as soon as March 6, the agency revealed a new problem with the mission’s rocket that “almost assuredly” scuttles that plan, according to a social media post by NASA administrator Jared Isaacman.

In a blog post on Saturday, NASA said that engineers had detected an interruption in the flow of helium in the upper stage of the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket. In his social media post, Isaacman confirmed the problem and said that the rocket will be removed from the launchpad and returned to the Vehicle Assembly Building for repair work.

“We will begin preparations for rollback, and this will take the March launch window out of consideration,” Isaacman wrote in a follow-up social media post.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Engineers are deciding what do next, NASA said in its blog post. The mission’s predecessor, Artemis I, also suffered from a helium problem, Isaacman wrote on social media. It is not yet clear if Artemis II’s issue is the same.

Artemis II has already been delayed numerous times, most recently because of its failed initial “wet dress rehearsal.” This key test involves loading the rocket with fuel, preparing the capsule that will house the Artemis II crew for the duration of the mission for launch and simulating a launch countdown. The first attempt was plagued by hydrogen fuel leaks and other problems. But the second attempt, which took place just days ago, was a success—that’s why NASA had been confident in a March launch date mere hours before this new problem arose.

When it does eventually launch, Artemis II will see four astronauts—NASA’s Christina Koch, Reid Wiseman, and Victor Glover and Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen—fly on a 10-day journey around the moon and back. Together, they will observe the moon’s elusive farside and perform critical tests that will help form the basis for Artemis III—NASA’s planned mission to, by 2028, return humans to the lunar surface for the first time in more than half a century.

Editor’s Note (2/23/26): This article was edited after posting to better clarify the descriptions of Jared Isaacman’s social media posts and to reflect an update to NASA’s blog post.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe