New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

New Charging Technique Puts Crumbling Batteries Back Together

The method could extend the lifetime of lithium-metal batteries by 30 percent, a new study suggests

Different colors of VW electric cars being unloaded off a ramp.

Various electric cars of the Volkswagen Group at the company’s plant in Zwickau, Germany, on January 27, 2022.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For electric cars to run as long as possible between charges, their batteries need to pack a punch. One option would be lithium-metal batteries, which have a key component made of this lightweight element. This gives them greater storage capacity than widely used lithium-ion batteries, with the same component made from graphite. Although lithium-metal batteries can store more energy than lithium-ion batteries of the same size, they also degrade faster, limiting how many times they can charge and discharge. But researchers have found a new charging technique that can actually restore the damaged material, significantly extending the battery’s lifetime.

As a rechargeable lithium-based battery charges and discharges, lithium ions move back and forth between the positively charged cathode and the negatively charged anode. But over time, small pieces of the reactive material fail to latch onto the anode’s body. Within the battery, the lost chunks form tiny lithium “islands” that most researchers had considered inactive—until now. Stanford University researchers found that these isolated bits could still respond electrically, physically moving back and forth as the battery charged and discharged. Their discovery was published in Nature.

The scientists found that the islands could wiggle around enough to reestablish an electrical connection between the isolated lithium and the anode. They realized they could coax the material back together by immediately discharging a small amount of electricity after the battery had been charged to capacity. “That’s how we promote [the lost lithium’s] growth toward the anode to reestablish the electrical connection,” says the study’s lead author and Stanford materials scientist Fang Liu. When a lithium-metal test battery was charged using this protocol, it could perform more charging cycles, lasting 29 percent longer than a battery that underwent standard charging.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Kelsey Hatzell, a Princeton University electrochemical and materials scientist who was not involved in the study, says the finding contributes to the fundamental understanding of lithium-metal batteries. “Observing ... the dynamics of isolated lithium metal is very challenging,” she says, adding that the researchers “have designed a lot of very intriguing experiments to start to deconvolute the mechanisms.” She notes, however, that practical applications may be far off; these batteries still fall short of the thousands of charging cycles that rechargeable batteries must endure.

The Stanford researchers hope to further develop their charging method to maximize lithium-metal battery lifetime. They are also working on a charging protocol that would extend lithium-ion batteries’ usability. “I will consider [this study] as a major discovery for the battery field—lithium-ion, lithium-metal,” says senior author and Stanford materials scientist Yi Cui. “It can be generalized, I think, to the whole battery field.”

Sophie Bushwick was formerly the technology editor at Scientific American. She makes frequent appearances on radio shows such as Science Friday and television networks, including CBS, MSNBC and National Geographic. She has more than a decade of experience as a science journalist based in New York City and previously worked at outlets such as Popular Science,Discover and Gizmodo. Follow Bushwick on X (formerly Twitter) @sophiebushwick

More by Sophie Bushwick
Scientific American Magazine Vol 326 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Power Up” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 326 No. 4 (), p. 21
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0422-21

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe