New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

New Insights into Ancient Greece’s Planetary Motion Machine

Quantum timing, the evolution of animal sounds, militias, and more in the January 2022 issue

Scientific American, January 2022

Scientific American, January 2022

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Antikythera mechanism is one of the most astonishing discoveries in archaeology. Salvaged from a 2,000-year-old shipwreck in Greece in 1900, the intricately geared contraption was quickly recognized as a machine for calculating the movement of the moon and planets. It continues to surprise, as researcher Tony Freeth reveals. The gears are more delicate and complex than we knew when Freeth shared his team’s results in 2009, predicting more celestial events with precision and ingenuity.

This isn’t the first issue of Scientific American to share the Antikythera device on the cover; it was our lead story in June 1959 as well. That edition, available in our digital archives, is bursting with ads for new plastics—Marlex from the Phillips Chemical Company, Delrin from DuPont—asbestos fiber from Johns-Manville, rocket navigators from Northrop, and the “first all transistorized analog computer” for $4,000 from Electronic Associates, Inc. Many of these products are long forgotten, but the Antikythera (pronounced with stress on the syllable “kyth,” like “pith”) mechanism and research on it will probably outlast them all.

Going back much further in time, paleontologist Michael B. Habib takes us to the dawn of animal noises. The first buzzes from insects started around 250 million years ago, followed by vertebrates evolving the ability to produce and detect sounds, and then birds’ exquisite singing apparatuses. I found myself noticing and appreciating animal noises more than usual after reading the article, and it might give you a smile next time a squirrel chatters at you.

On January 6, 2021, when armed insurrectionists stormed the U.S. Capitol and tried to prevent the peaceful transition of power after the presidential election, Scientific American editors started reaching out to experts who could help us understand what was happening. Sociologist Amy Cooter has been studying militia movements for years, and she warned in an opinion piece we ran online last January that the risk of continued violence is high. Her revelatory piece explores the range and motivations of militia groups and the shift she and other experts have seen toward more extremism.

Algal blooms that contaminate sea life are becoming more common in Alaska (and everywhere), but unlike in other coastal states, there is no governmental monitoring system to safeguard people from potentially deadly shellfish. Now Alaskans, including many Indigenous people, are building their own networks of testing and monitoring stations to protect this crucial and traditional source of food. Follow along with journalist Karen Pinchin and photographer Kiliii Yuyan.

One of the most controversial diagnoses in psychiatry is borderline personality disorder. Experts have disagreed on how to define, classify and especially treat the condition. Now, as journalist Diana Kwon reports, research is connecting borderline personality disorder with certain types of post-traumatic stress disorder, which might remove some of the stigma from the diagnosis and reveal better ways of understanding and treating it.

Quantum physics tells us that we can’t predict exactly where a particle will, say, land on a screen. But stranger still is the fact that we also can’t predict when the particle will land. As author Anil Ananthaswamy explains, a new experimental approach that requires exquisite precision could time particles’ travel well enough to support “an underworld of unseen waves that guide particles from place to place.” Let’s hope the experiments are successful; the physicists involved say results could come in a year. 

Laura Helmuth was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American. She previously worked as an editor for the Washington Post, National Geographic, Slate, Smithsonian and Science. She is a former president of the National Association of Science Writers. She is currently a member of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's standing committee on advancing science communication and an advisory board member for SciLine and The Transmitter. She has a Ph.D. in cognitive neuroscience from the University of California, Berkeley. She recently won a Friend of Darwin Award from the National Center for Science Education. Follow her on Bluesky @laurahelmuth.bsky.social

More by Laura Helmuth
Scientific American Magazine Vol 326 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Planetary Motion Machine” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 326 No. 1 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0122-4

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe