New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

New Predictors of Disease

Molecules called predictive autoantibodies appear in the blood years before people show symptoms of various disorders. Tests that detected these molecules could warn of the need to take preventive action

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A middle-aged woman--call her Anne--was taken aback when one day her right hand refused to hold a pen. A few weeks later her right foot began to drag reluctantly behind her left. After her symptoms worsened over months, she consulted a neurologist. Anne, it turned out, was suffering from multiple sclerosis, a potentially disabling type of autoimmune disease. The immune system normally jumps into action in response to bacteria and viruses, deploying antibodies, other molecules and various white blood cells to recognize and destroy trespassers. But in autoimmune disorders, components of the body's immune system target one or more of the person's own tissues. In Anne's case, her defensive system had begun to turn against her nerves, eroding her ability to move.

Every story of autoimmune disease is sad--but collectively the impact of these illnesses is staggering. More than 40 autoimmune conditions have been identified, including such common examples as type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis and celiac disease. Together they constitute the third leading cause of sickness and death after heart disease and cancer. And they afflict between 5 and 8 percent of the U.S. population, racking up an annual medical bill in the tens of billions of dollars.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 296 Issue 3This article was published with the title “New Predictors of Disease” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 296 No. 3 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican032007-7lZBgr9MSoQtJPj40S3oys

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe