October 2024: Science History from 50, 100 and 150 Years Ago

Best baseball batting order; mummies demystified

Old timey comic strip

1924, Safer Traffic: “Idealistic sketch shows how the proper delineation of traffic lanes that bring all intersecting courses together at right angles will iron out the confusion of a busy corner. [And yet] the flashing beacon is vastly superior to mere marks on the pavement or signs at the curb.”

Scientific American, Vol. 131, No. 4; October 1924

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

1974

Best Baseball Batting Order

“Managers and baseball strategists give much thought to the batting order, following such precepts as putting a good runner first and a big hitter in the ‘clean­up,’ or fourth, spot. Does it make any difference? R. Allan Freeze of the University of British Columbia, writing in Operations Research, says ‘the effect of using the best batting order rather than the worst is less than three extra wins per 162-game season.’ Freeze conducted a computer simulation of some 200,000 baseball games, with teams in the traditional lineup, a second lineup of hitters in descending order of productivity, and a third lineup in ascending order.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


1924

Life and Limb for Air Mail

“We pay tribute to the people of the Post Office Transcontinental Air Mail Service, the greatest single step ever taken to make commercial aviation a practical day-and-night reality. Very much to the point is the following quotation from a talk by Captain Hyde-­Pearson, a veteran of the World War, shortly before he was killed in the air mail service: ‘We risk our necks; we give our lives; we perfect a service for the benefit of the world at large.’ While you sit in the safe shelter of your office or sleep in the secure comfort of your bed, these boys by day and by night may be sweeping through rain or snow or fog or the blackness of the night, with death ever at their shoulder, in the performance of a duty whose pay is small, whose risks are great, and whose only reward can be the gratitude and admiration of the American public.”

Mummies Demystified

“At the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago it was found possible to take X-ray photographs of a group of Peruvian mummy packs. To have unwrapped these mummy packs to ascertain whether they contained objects of special interest would have meant their destruction. By means of the X-ray pictures it is possible to learn what has been buried with the body. In the packs thus far examined have been found ears of corn, pottery, vessels of clay containing shells, bits of metal, gourd vessels, beads, clay figurines, cut-bone objects—or in some instances, nothing. It is also possible to gather something definite concerning the age, sex and condition of the bony structure of the body buried therein.”

Lady Edison, Inventor and Entrepreneur

“Lady Edison, as she is called, has 47 inventions to her credit and a diversity which is truly remarkable. The Lady Edison is Miss Beulah Louise Henry in New York. Here is a list of a few of her inventions: telephone call list; handbag with interchangeable covers; hair curler; ice cream freezer; pencil; electric fan shield; rubber reducing garment; ‘Kiddie Klock’ for teaching time; glove snaps and a roulette top. Miss Henry does not claim to have any special mechanical talent, and she torpedoed the idea that invention is the product of solitude. ‘The solution of the snapper that fastens the corners of the umbrella to the frame came one day when I was preparing to go to a matinee with my mother,’ she recalled. ‘The biggest umbrella men in the country said it could not be done. Of course, I did not believe them. I have my inventions patented in four different countries, and I am president of two newly incorporated companies.’”

1874

Call Me A Scient

“Mr. Proctor recently asked for a single word which should convey the meaning of ‘man of science.’ Mr. Gosse has recently suggested the name ‘scient’—a word which receives the support of Mr. A. J. Ellis, who, in the Academy for September 19, says: ‘I beg leave formally to introduce a scient and to propose that this strictly formed disyllable should take the place of the American barbaric trisyllable scientist.’ It will be seen, however, from the letter of a correspondent that the word is not entirely unobjectionable, as it may be confounded with Science when it is spoken in the plural. We suggest that our cousins call him the ‘sci-­ist,’ which will be O.K., used in the singular or plural.”

Covers of three issues of Scientific American from October 1974, 1924 and 1874.

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti
Scientific American Magazine Vol 331 Issue 3This article was published with the title “50, 100 & 150 Years” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 331 No. 3 (), p. 74
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican102024-1pyEmUTEg1i1Y70CR3xr5a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe