New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

One's Enough: Kidney Donors Live Just as Long as Nondonors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Every 30 minutes all the blood in our bodies is filtered through two kidneys. But diabetes can cause these fist-size organs to fail, leading to a buildup of chemicals in the blood that would be fatal without dialysis or a kidney transplant.

At least 6,000 healthy people every year in the U.S. donate a kidney to someone they know, and about 100 more come forward to anonymously give the gift of glomeruli (the basic filtration units of the kidney). It’s true that you only need one kidney to live, but the operation required to remove its twin and the risk of disease developing in the remaining one later on make donation a serious decision.

Transplant surgeon Dorry Segev of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine studied mortality among 80,000 kidney donors during the past 15 years, comparing them with healthy people who have both kidneys. The study, published March 10 in the Journal of the American Medical Association—60 years after the first kidney transplant in the U.S.—found no increase in mortality among donors once they recover from the operation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although donors are carefully screened before the procedure, Segev emphasizes that there are risks: “It’s still a major operation. You’re still living with one kidney. People still need to think about it and be aware of the risks in taking on this heroic act.”

Scientific American Magazine Vol 302 Issue 5This article was published with the title “One’s enough: Kidney Donors Live Just as Long as Nondonors” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 302 No. 5 (), p. 20
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican052010-3pDyq1qD8ixrqFjbD6U0k1

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe