New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Our Planet, Ourselves: How Climate Change Results in Emerging Diseases

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Mosquitoes—and the parasites and viruses that they carry—are pushing up the incidence of malaria globally and causing periodic explosive outbreaks of Rift Valley fever, which first brings on flulike symptoms but can turn into a severe hemorrhagic fever akin to Ebola.* Bluetongue virus, a ruminant virus spread by midges that was once confined to tropical areas, has reached as far as Norway. Studies have shown shifts in cholera transmission with recent climate variability. As emerging diseases migrate to new areas, they encounter new species, making outbreaks even more difficult to manage.

Unfortunately, writes journalist Lois Parshley in her feature article “Catching Fever,” the common enabler for the movement of each of these ailments is human-caused climate change. As weather patterns wreak more havoc, a Pandora's box of microbes enters new terrain, stressing global public health systems.

Parshley's article is part of an important special report on “The Future of Medicine.” In the package, contributing editor Melinda Wenner Moyer describes the “American Epidemic”: a resurgence of infectious disease outbreaks that are sickening thousands. Before vaccines, better sanitation and indoor plumbing, the root causes of such waves of illness and death were mainly biological: viruses, bacteria and parasites. Now they are social as well: growing income inequality in the U.S. has led to rising rates of hepatitis A, Legionnaires' disease and other scourges. The problems are hardly confined to poor neighborhoods, although they may reemerge there. Once an outbreak occurs, it's not choosy about whom it infects. After a formidable flu season this year, associate editor Dina Fine Maron looks “Beyond the Flu Shot.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Such alterations are happening whether we want to use the words “climate change” or not. Whether we acknowledge the scientific consensus, demonstrated in thousands of studies over decades, climate change is both real and promoted by human activities. Coastal communities are being affected by rising seas, drought-prone areas are arid for longer periods and, as our report shows, infectious agents are taking advantage of these more extreme weather patterns.

For more than 170 years Scientific American has ably chronicled how advances in science and technology have advanced discovery and shaped the world. But I think we all could do a better job communicating the value of an evidence-based view for addressing human problems. For this reason, I have agreed to join the Advisory Committee for the Climate Communications Initiative of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. You can learn more about it here: http://nas-sites.org/americasclimatechoices/cci. As always, I welcome your comments.

*Editor's Note (6/26/18): This sentence was edited after it was posted online. The original in the print edition erroneously referred to malaria as a viral rather than a parasitic disease.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 318 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Our Planet, Ourselves” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 318 No. 5 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0518-4

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe