Paper Money

A substitute for coins turned into a passport for globalization

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Blame it on paper currency. The development of banknotes in China more than a millennium ago accelerated wealth accumulation, deficit spending and credit extension—paving the way for our present-day financial crisis.

When Chinese merchants started using paper money in the Tang Dynasty (which spanned A.D. 618 to 907), they could have hardly foreseen such difficulties. At the time, the introduction of notes that could be redeemed for coins at the end of a long journey was a boon. Paper cut down on traders’ loads, enabling them to transport large sums of money over sizable distances.

The practice caught on nationwide in the 10th century, when a copper shortage prompted the emperor of the Song Dynasty to issue the world’s first circulating notes. A string of earlier Chinese inventions—including paper, ink and block printing—made it all possible.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When Marco Polo visited the Mongol Empire in the 1200s, he was impressed by Kublai Khan’s sophisticated mints, connecting them to an apparently booming economy. (The explorer did not pick up on signs of the inflation brought on by the rapid printing of notes.) Later, faster circulation of currency allowed European nations to siphon resources out of Asia and Africa, fundamentally altering the global balance of power.

Today paper money means that wealth flows back to the developing world as well. Financial convertibility makes it possible for China to buy up U.S. bonds, financing debts that may never be paid back. But it also escalates the pace of wealth accumulation. Paper currency—and its modern heir, electronic trading—lay behind the recent commodities and housing bubbles, contributing to last year’s financial crash.

In today’s recession, things have come full circle. Amid concerns about financial stability, some investors are holding on to precious metals. A backlash against more abstract forms of currency means a return to our economic roots: centuries after our conversion to paper, the price of gold has soared.

Mara Hvistendahl is an investigative reporter at the New York Times and author of Unnatural Selection: Choosing Boys over Girls, and the Consequences of a World Full of Men (PublicAffairs, 2011). Her newest book is The Scientist and the Spy: A True Story of China, the FBI, and Industrial Espionage (Riverhead, 2020).

More by Mara Hvistendahl
Scientific American Magazine Vol 301 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Paper Money” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 301 No. 3 (), p. 81
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0909-81a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe