New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Paper Money

A substitute for coins turned into a passport for globalization

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Blame it on paper currency. The development of banknotes in China more than a millennium ago accelerated wealth accumulation, deficit spending and credit extension—paving the way for our present-day financial crisis.

When Chinese merchants started using paper money in the Tang Dynasty (which spanned A.D. 618 to 907), they could have hardly foreseen such difficulties. At the time, the introduction of notes that could be redeemed for coins at the end of a long journey was a boon. Paper cut down on traders’ loads, enabling them to transport large sums of money over sizable distances.

The practice caught on nationwide in the 10th century, when a copper shortage prompted the emperor of the Song Dynasty to issue the world’s first circulating notes. A string of earlier Chinese inventions—including paper, ink and block printing—made it all possible.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When Marco Polo visited the Mongol Empire in the 1200s, he was impressed by Kublai Khan’s sophisticated mints, connecting them to an apparently booming economy. (The explorer did not pick up on signs of the inflation brought on by the rapid printing of notes.) Later, faster circulation of currency allowed European nations to siphon resources out of Asia and Africa, fundamentally altering the global balance of power.

Today paper money means that wealth flows back to the developing world as well. Financial convertibility makes it possible for China to buy up U.S. bonds, financing debts that may never be paid back. But it also escalates the pace of wealth accumulation. Paper currency—and its modern heir, electronic trading—lay behind the recent commodities and housing bubbles, contributing to last year’s financial crash.

In today’s recession, things have come full circle. Amid concerns about financial stability, some investors are holding on to precious metals. A backlash against more abstract forms of currency means a return to our economic roots: centuries after our conversion to paper, the price of gold has soared.

Mara Hvistendahl is an investigative reporter at the New York Times and author of Unnatural Selection: Choosing Boys over Girls, and the Consequences of a World Full of Men (PublicAffairs, 2011). Her newest book is The Scientist and the Spy: A True Story of China, the FBI, and Industrial Espionage (Riverhead, 2020).

More by Mara Hvistendahl
Scientific American Magazine Vol 301 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Paper Money” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 301 No. 3 (), p. 81
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0909-81a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe