Paving the Way—Working Knowledge on Roads

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Lay down some hot black stuff, and you’ve got a road, right? Not quite. Much more is hidden underneath.

Terminology explains a lot about road construction. Scottish engineer John McAdam is generally credited with designing in the early 19th century the first modern roads made by compressing thick deposits of crushed, angular stones. Builders later poured hot tar to bind the top layer, producing a “tarmacadam” pathway, or tarmac. Although this term lingers, the method has not been used for decades (not even at airports). By the later 1800s asphalt had become the binder of choice. And blacktop? A synonym for asphalt.

Today asphalt roads dominate the landscape, followed by concrete and “unbound aggregate”—gravel. All three formats are built up in layers comprising increasingly finer, denser and harder rock particles. Top levels of asphalt or concrete reduce wear and seal out water that can cause cracking. Most fissures form from the bottom up as underbeds shift or erode. To repair them, road crews typically add a new layer. But if damage is extensive, they may mill (scrape off) several inches and resurface.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Recent innovations include “perpetual pavement,” built on a costly but tough base of asphalt that is supposed to resist damage for twice as long as conventional structures. Stone-matrix designs, in which the size and shape of stones within surface layers is carefully controlled, also promise longer life; they are popular in Europe and are becoming widespread in the U.S. Porous pavement, which allows water to percolate through instead of run off, is being tried in parking lots.

Asphalt and concrete proponents present various arguments about which compositions are better for a given application, but ultimately the choice comes down to economics. “The decision should be made on life-cycle costs,” says David E. Newcomb, vice president of research and technology at the National Asphalt Pavement Association in Lanham, Md. “It’s a balancing act” of materials and labor, time needed to lay the road (and therefore traffic inconvenience), years of durability, and maintenance and repair. The final analysis, Newcomb allows, “can be a nebulous thing.”

Topic suggested by reader Derek Vogt. Send ideas to workingknowledge@sciam.com

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti
Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Paving the Way” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 4 (), p. 96
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1005-96

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe