New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Working Knowledge: Bowling Pinsetters—Perpetual Reset Machine

Bowling Pinsetters

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A busy bowling alley might seem noisy, but behind the lanes the cacophony is significantly louder. As the heavy balls crash into the wooden pins, hefty motors, conveyor belts, pulleys and cams clatter behind each “pit,” grabbing the wreckage from one collision while hoisting and arranging pins so they are ready for the next one.

For years pin boys stood at the lane ends, manually resetting pins and rolling the balls back to bowlers. Machines did not appear until 1946, when AMF Bowling, Inc., now in Richmond, Va., introduced the first “automated pinspotter.” Brunswick Corporation in Lake Forest, Ill., later offered a competing “pinsetter,” and the two companies still dominate the market today with technology that is strongly reminiscent of the original.

What has changed most are the bells and whistles designed to expand bowling’s popularity. In the 1980s cameras were placed between the lanes, pointed at the pins, and wired to computers that automatically calculated bowlers’ scores and displayed them overhead. More recently, a system of blacklights, fluorescent pins, laser beams, loud music and video screens has turned the ordinary routine into a dazzling late-night dance party promoted as cosmic, disco or “Xtreme” bowling.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A visit to the back end of a typical 24-lane alley, such as Cove Bowling Lanes in Great Barrington, Mass., reveals a mechanical engineer’s paradise. Twenty-four steel, wood and rubber pinspotter machines relentlessly chunk along shoulder to shoulder; each one is about five feet tall, weighs about 2,000 pounds and collects, sorts and resets 10 pins in around eight seconds. Racks of spare belts, cams, rods, levers, oils and rags line the rear wall, looking like a cluttered auto repair garage. Cove Bowling Lanes head mechanic DJ Marks must inspect, clean and lubricate each machine every week. “It’s pretty much a constant job,” he says happily. “I do five machines a day—four on Fridays.” He shows them off to enthusiastic patrons and says most proprietors will do the same. So on your next trip to the lanes, if you are not compiling a marvelous score, ask for a peek at the mechanical marvels instead.

Did You Know...
HUMAN TARGET: Pin boys reset pins before machines came along. “You really had to work fast, or the bowlers would yell at you, ‘Hey, get moving!’” recalls Paul Retseck, 84, who set pins in the 1930s for $1 a night in Michigan City, Ind. Drunken patrons sometimes tried to hurl balls at boys who were stooped over picking up pins: “We learned to hop up quick onto the side wall,” Retseck says. Above: Subway Bowling Alleys in Brooklyn, N.Y., at 1 a.m., April 1910.

LOST BALL: Occasionally a ball does not return to the bowler. The most likely culprit is a pin that becomes lodged in the ball-return inlet hole, wedged under the return lever. An attendant must remove the pin, although a second bowled ball might knock it free, too.

RESET: At times the sweep bar may stall on the lane. This usually occurs because the table did not receive all 10 pins. The missing pin prompts the arm to stay above the table instead of returning to its neutral position, which signals the sweep cycle to continue. A bowler can request help from an attendant by pressing the reset button.

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti
Scientific American Magazine Vol 298 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Perpetual Reset Machine” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 298 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican012008-6qZ1I7g6bvDr5SrrKLfouw

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe