New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Physics at the Limits

Scientists have only recently gathered definitive evidence of the existence of black holes.

Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

To outsiders, the field of physics may seem like a neat and tidy affair. What fundamental discoveries are left to make, right? Wrong. In fact, physicists are pushing into the extreme ends of the universe as we know it—from invisible particles and colliding massive black holes to the most crushing gravitational forces ever detected and spooky quantum entanglement. The 14-billion-year-old tale of our universe is far from over.

Innovative projects are hunting the smallest units of matter. Scientists at CERN's Large Hadron Collider have set their sights on “virtual” particles that seem to pop in and out of existence and defy the laws of physics. And soon the largest experiment of its kind will beam minuscule neutrinos underground from Illinois to South Dakota, with luck demonstrating how these mysterious particles buck the Standard Model.

On the larger scales of physics, the detection in 2015 of two black holes crashing together some 1.3 billion light-years away launched a wave of discovery, and new data are rolling in at a frequency of months rather than years. Meanwhile the debate rages over whether invisible particles indeed make up the dark matter that fills the entire universe or whether we need to revise what we know about how gravity works altogether.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Thanks to new gravitational-wave detectors, we are finally getting a clearer picture of some of the densest places in existence; the core of neutron stars may prove to be a goopy superfluid. An alternative theory posits that rather than arising from dead stars, the earliest black holes materialized out of clouds of dust.

Quantum theory continues to captivate; theorists are trying to get their head around the ramifications of a multiverse—that is, do infinite worlds coexist in a statistical “probability space,” or do too many universes violate the laws of physics entirely? The next phase of quantum research will attempt to put living organisms into superposition, probing for where precisely scientists can observe quantum effects.

Perhaps more than any other field, physics requires a churning of old ideas, either modulating them to explain the latest observations or scrapping them altogether. Much of its work is done in the human mind as Gedankenexperiments, or “thought experiments,” as Albert Einstein called them. For this reason, Sabine Hossenfelder writes, there is a fine, often blurry line between scientific intuition and fantasy. But there seems to be no finish line of discovery, even on the distant horizon.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Special Editions Vol 28 Issue 2sThis article was published with the title “Physics at the Limits” in SA Special Editions Vol. 28 No. 2s (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanphysics0419-1

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe