Physics at the Limits

Scientists have only recently gathered definitive evidence of the existence of black holes.

Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

To outsiders, the field of physics may seem like a neat and tidy affair. What fundamental discoveries are left to make, right? Wrong. In fact, physicists are pushing into the extreme ends of the universe as we know it—from invisible particles and colliding massive black holes to the most crushing gravitational forces ever detected and spooky quantum entanglement. The 14-billion-year-old tale of our universe is far from over.

Innovative projects are hunting the smallest units of matter. Scientists at CERN's Large Hadron Collider have set their sights on “virtual” particles that seem to pop in and out of existence and defy the laws of physics. And soon the largest experiment of its kind will beam minuscule neutrinos underground from Illinois to South Dakota, with luck demonstrating how these mysterious particles buck the Standard Model.

On the larger scales of physics, the detection in 2015 of two black holes crashing together some 1.3 billion light-years away launched a wave of discovery, and new data are rolling in at a frequency of months rather than years. Meanwhile the debate rages over whether invisible particles indeed make up the dark matter that fills the entire universe or whether we need to revise what we know about how gravity works altogether.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Thanks to new gravitational-wave detectors, we are finally getting a clearer picture of some of the densest places in existence; the core of neutron stars may prove to be a goopy superfluid. An alternative theory posits that rather than arising from dead stars, the earliest black holes materialized out of clouds of dust.

Quantum theory continues to captivate; theorists are trying to get their head around the ramifications of a multiverse—that is, do infinite worlds coexist in a statistical “probability space,” or do too many universes violate the laws of physics entirely? The next phase of quantum research will attempt to put living organisms into superposition, probing for where precisely scientists can observe quantum effects.

Perhaps more than any other field, physics requires a churning of old ideas, either modulating them to explain the latest observations or scrapping them altogether. Much of its work is done in the human mind as Gedankenexperiments, or “thought experiments,” as Albert Einstein called them. For this reason, Sabine Hossenfelder writes, there is a fine, often blurry line between scientific intuition and fantasy. But there seems to be no finish line of discovery, even on the distant horizon.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Special Editions Vol 28 Issue 2sThis article was published with the title “Physics at the Limits” in SA Special Editions Vol. 28 No. 2s (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanphysics0419-1

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe