New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

“Plasma Scalpels” May Make Surgery More Precise and Less Bloody

Plasma cutters could make surgery less bloody

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In medicine, plasma usually refers to the liquid component of blood. Now scientists are researching how to better harness the plasma found in stars and lightning—the fourth fundamental state of matter, alongside solids, liquids and gases—to cut into the body like a blowtorch for bloodless surgery.

Since the early 20th century, surgeons have used sparks of plasma to zap warts and other malignant tissues. Late in that century researchers began investigating how jets of plasma might be used to carve up flesh just as industrial plasma cutters have carved up metal since the 1960s. These plasma scalpels would cauterize flesh as they slice. “It's like a lightsaber,” says Washington, D.C., surgeon Jerome Canady, who invented one of the first surgical plasma cutters.

Internal bleeding can be lethal, and finding ways to prevent it can be potentially lifesaving. Minimizing the need for blood transfusions can also be vital, especially on the battlefield—U.S. Special Operations Command field-tested surgical plasma knives in 2008.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A plasma cutter works by streaming pressurized gas such as argon through a narrow channel, where it acquires an electrical charge, transforming it into a blade of plasma traveling more than 1,500 miles per hour. Surgical plasma cutters typically use relatively cold plasmas, hot enough to cauterize tissue on direct contact but only heat surrounding cells to about 97 degrees Fahrenheit. “We can get it more precise than a scalpel blade,” Canady says. “You get 0.4 to 0.8 millimeter [0.02 to 0.03 inch] of collateral damage with conventional scalpels, but just 0.1 to 0.2 millimeter [0.004 to 0.008 inch] with plasma cutters.”

Increasingly, research suggests that plasma can have therapeutic effects beyond those from heat. Plasma causes the neutrally charged oxygen and nitrogen molecules in the air to become electrically charged. The elements then form ozone, nitrogen oxide and other reactive compounds that can kill off bacteria and cancer cells. Plasma physicist Michael Keidar, director of the George Washington Institute for Nanotechnology in Washington, D.C., and his colleagues have a five-year, $445,000 grant to investigate the physical effects of plasma on the body. Perhaps controlling the frequency, voltage and waveform of the electrical pulses used to energize the plasma affects the depth to which it penetrates living tissue. Such knowledge could help make cuts even more precise and optimize plasma cutting's antibacterial and anticancer effects. “There's been no basic research into this application of plasma,” Keidar says. “We hope a full understanding of the mechanisms of what plasma does will open a lot of doors.”

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 308 Issue 6This article was published with the title ““Nurse, Pass the Blowtorch”” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 308 No. 6 (), p. 26
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0613-26

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe