“Plasma Scalpels” May Make Surgery More Precise and Less Bloody

Plasma cutters could make surgery less bloody

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In medicine, plasma usually refers to the liquid component of blood. Now scientists are researching how to better harness the plasma found in stars and lightning—the fourth fundamental state of matter, alongside solids, liquids and gases—to cut into the body like a blowtorch for bloodless surgery.

Since the early 20th century, surgeons have used sparks of plasma to zap warts and other malignant tissues. Late in that century researchers began investigating how jets of plasma might be used to carve up flesh just as industrial plasma cutters have carved up metal since the 1960s. These plasma scalpels would cauterize flesh as they slice. “It's like a lightsaber,” says Washington, D.C., surgeon Jerome Canady, who invented one of the first surgical plasma cutters.

Internal bleeding can be lethal, and finding ways to prevent it can be potentially lifesaving. Minimizing the need for blood transfusions can also be vital, especially on the battlefield—U.S. Special Operations Command field-tested surgical plasma knives in 2008.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A plasma cutter works by streaming pressurized gas such as argon through a narrow channel, where it acquires an electrical charge, transforming it into a blade of plasma traveling more than 1,500 miles per hour. Surgical plasma cutters typically use relatively cold plasmas, hot enough to cauterize tissue on direct contact but only heat surrounding cells to about 97 degrees Fahrenheit. “We can get it more precise than a scalpel blade,” Canady says. “You get 0.4 to 0.8 millimeter [0.02 to 0.03 inch] of collateral damage with conventional scalpels, but just 0.1 to 0.2 millimeter [0.004 to 0.008 inch] with plasma cutters.”

Increasingly, research suggests that plasma can have therapeutic effects beyond those from heat. Plasma causes the neutrally charged oxygen and nitrogen molecules in the air to become electrically charged. The elements then form ozone, nitrogen oxide and other reactive compounds that can kill off bacteria and cancer cells. Plasma physicist Michael Keidar, director of the George Washington Institute for Nanotechnology in Washington, D.C., and his colleagues have a five-year, $445,000 grant to investigate the physical effects of plasma on the body. Perhaps controlling the frequency, voltage and waveform of the electrical pulses used to energize the plasma affects the depth to which it penetrates living tissue. Such knowledge could help make cuts even more precise and optimize plasma cutting's antibacterial and anticancer effects. “There's been no basic research into this application of plasma,” Keidar says. “We hope a full understanding of the mechanisms of what plasma does will open a lot of doors.”

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 308 Issue 6This article was published with the title ““Nurse, Pass the Blowtorch”” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 308 No. 6 (), p. 26
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0613-26

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe