If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
What we all learned in high school about lichen—that it's the synergistic collaboration of a fungus and algae or cyanobacteria—is simplified in many ways. For one thing, the original organisms are changed utterly in the compact. They can't return to what they were. For another, according to Anne Pringle, one of the leading contemporary mycologists (with whom I had the lucky opportunity to collaborate), it may be that lichen do not, given sufficient nutrients, age. Anne says that our sense of the inevitability of death may be determined by our mammalian orientation. Perhaps some forms of life are immortal. The thought of two things that come together and alter each other collaboratively—two things becoming one thing that does not age—roused me toward considering lichen a kind of model and metaphor for the intricacies of intimacy.—F.G.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
