How Not to Be Crass Wearing Google's Glass

Four rules of engagement for using Google's wearable smart device in public

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This month, my Scientific American column took a look at the prospects for Google Glass, Google's futuristic, eye-mounted, pseudo-smartphone thing. Frankly, Glass's greatest vulnerability isn't that it may fail technologically, it's that it may fail socially. How comfortable will you be when you're conversing with someone who may or may not be filming you?

At least one business has already banned Google Glass, in an effort to avoid making all the non-Glass customers uncomfortable. And already, organizations like

StoptheCyborgs.org hope to stop Glass and avoid "a future in which privacy is impossible."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But perhaps what the world needs is something a little less hasty, a little more considered: an etiquette guide for the new world of wearable computing.

Rule 1. Tell people when you're filming them. Taking pictures or videos with Glass is not like using a camera or a phone; any of those gadgets alert others that you're recording simply because you're holding it up. Glass offers no indication that you're filming except a subtle red light (which an app could turn off anyway) and no indication at all that you've captured a still photo.

So rule 1 is that it's your job to tell people when you're about to take their picture.

Rule 2. No Glass when you're face to face. Wear them hiking, biking, skydiving, playing with your toddler—all the places you see them used in Google promotional videos. But when you're interacting with somebody, push Glass up onto your head like sunglasses. Not only does that prevent you from secretly filming and surreptitiously checking your e-mail, it also demonstrates some sensitivity on your part in acknowledging that Glass glasses are creepy.

So: No Glass at dinner. No Glass at a party. And no Glass on dates. Then again, that problem is self-correcting; nobody would go out with you if you show up wearing them.

Rule 3. No Glass wherever cameras are already prohibited. Art museums, movie theaters, courtrooms, Broadway shows, corporate whiteboards, government agencies, etcetera. In a world where you might be secretly taking pictures or videos, you'd better believe this will become the rule before you can say, "Please put that away, sir."

Rule 4. No Glass in potential ogling situations. Put them away in the locker room, even if you don't intend to use them. It's just awkward for you to be in a position where you could be recording other people's flab.

You'd best not wear them at the pool or the beach, either. Attractive people wearing bathing suits will instantly assume you're a pervert.

It's even uncool to wear them in situations where you could be filming strangers—on the subway, for example. And even if "uncool" doesn't bother you, getting slapped or gut-punched might.

David Pogue is the anchor columnist for Yahoo Tech and host of several NOVA miniseries on PBS.

More by David Pogue
Scientific American Magazine Vol 308 Issue 6This article was published with the title “How Not to Be Crass Wearing Google's Glass” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 308 No. 6 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican062013-1t9T4t4CtXvaNxVmvVOuHw

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe