Psst... Hey, You--Working Knowledge on Directional Sound

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

You are walking down a quiet grocery store aisle when suddenly a voice says: “Thirsty? Buy me.” You stop in front of the soda display, but no one is next to you, and shoppers a few feet away do not seem to hear a thing.

At that moment, you are standing in a cylinder of sound. Whereas a loudspeaker broadcasts sound in all directions, the way a lightbulb radiates light, a directional speaker shines a beam of waves akin to a spotlight. The beam consists of ultrasound waves, which humans cannot hear, but which can emit audible tones as they interact with air. By describing these interactions mathematically, engineers can coax a beam to exude voice, music or any other sound.

Military and sonar researchers tried to harness the phenomenon as far back as the 1960s but only managed to generate highly distorted audible signals. In 1998 Joseph Pompei, then at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, published algorithms that cut the distortion to only a few percent. He then designed an amplifier, electronics and speakers to produce ultrasound “that is clean enough to generate clean audio,” Pompei says. He trademarked the technology Audio Spotlight and started Holosonics, Inc., in Watertown, Mass., in 1999. Rival inventor Woody Norris markets a competing product called HyperSonic Sound from his American Technology Corporation in San Diego.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Pompei's speakers are installed in company lobbies, and above exhibits at the Boston Museum of Fine Arts and Walt Disney World's Epcot Center, among other locations. Narrations inform visitors standing in front of artifacts or video screens without filling the rooms with noise. Department stores have tried the arrangement for retail displays, and automakers are experimenting with them so passengers can hear only their own music or movies. A speaker above a recliner in the living room would allow Dad to hear the television while other family members read on the couch in peace.

Detractors say that in certain situations headphones can provide similar benefits, and note random problems, such as unwanted reflections off a car seat. But the primary obstacle to wider deployment is cost: systems run from $600 to $1,000 or more. If the price drops, consumers are more likely to consider buying the gear... or encounter it while shopping.

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti
Scientific American Magazine Vol 296 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Psst... Hey, You” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 296 No. 5 (), p. 96
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0507-96

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe