Recommended: Probably Approximately Correct

Books and recommendations from Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Probably Approximately Correct: Nature's Algorithms for Learning and Prospering in a Complex World
Leslie Valiant
Basic Books, 2013 ($27.99)

Valiant, a computer science professor at Harvard University, takes as his point of departure Alan Turing's 1936 paper that laid the groundwork for modern computers. Turing was the first to suggest that computation was subject to finite rules and therefore capable of being carried out by machines. Valiant argues that all living things have been capable of computation since the beginning of time, using “ecorithms” to predict the future and adapt to it. His book is an engaging meditation on complexity and on how living things often unwittingly use math to navigate it.

Anna Kuchment is a contributing editor at Scientific American and a staff science reporter at the Dallas Morning News. She is also co-author of a forthcoming book about earthquakes triggered by energy production.

More by Anna Kuchment
Scientific American Magazine Vol 308 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Probably Approximately Correct” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 308 No. 6 (), p. 88
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0613-88b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe