Scientists Create the Smallest-Ever Moving Cell

Just two genes get tiny synthetic cells moving, offering clues to life’s evolution

Illustration of cells using DNA strands to bounce.

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As a child, Makoto Miyata loved tinkering with radios and amplifiers. Now his interest in fiddling with things has only grown—but as a cellular biologist, he does it at a much finer scale. For a paper in Science Advances, Miyata's team at Osaka Metropolitan University in Japan has tweaked the genes of the smallest synthetic life-form to make it move on its own, hinting at how minimal genetic additions could have helped primordial cells begin to move.*

Researchers have long been working to understand how the earliest natural cells might have developed movement. Such studies have used the bacterial genus Spiroplasma: single-celled, helix-shaped parasitic microbes that move by simply bending, flexing and changing their shape—not by using specialized appendages, as many other bacteria do. In Spiroplasma, scientists had already identified seven genes likely to aid this kind of cell movement. But confirming these genes' precise roles experimentally has proved challenging.

The team turned to a synthetic cell, called JCVI-syn3.0 (syn3.0 for short), which researchers at the J. Craig Venter Institute created in 2016. The cell survives and replicates with a record-breakingly small total of 473 genes—humans, by comparison, have more than 20,000. But syn3.0 can't move.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Miyata and his colleagues inserted combinations of the seven movement-associated Spiroplasma genes into syn3.0 cells. He says he vividly remembers the moment he peered through a microscope and saw the previously stationary synthetic cells “dancing.” Nearly half had taken on new shapes; some had even developed twisting helical forms to swim, just like Spiroplasma.

Miyata had imagined creating a synthetic cell that could move, but he says it was still “quite surprising” when it actually happened. He wasn't the only one surprised, according to National Institute of Standards and Technology cellular engineer Elizabeth A. Strychalski, who was not involved in the study but attended a presentation ahead of its release. “When they showed the video of these organisms swimming and how their [shapes] had changed, you could almost feel the collective gasp,” she says. Miyata's team found that introducing combinations of just two genes was enough to produce Spiroplasma-like movement.

Strychalski notes that other researchers used a similar DNA-insertion technique to add jellyfish fluorescence genes into feline embryos, creating domestic cats that glowed. But few had expected it could work in synthetic cells. This experiment “felt very bold,” she says, “and [its success] is also tremendously motivating and uplifting for the field.”

Although it's hard to imagine what conditions triggered cells' first movements billions of years ago, this research shows how small changes could help them take that massive leap. The study also has implications for the future, Strychalski says: “Mobile synthetic cells might someday be engineered to seek out contaminants, pathogens or even cancer cells in the human body.”

*Editor’s Note (3/21/23): This sentence was edited after posting to correct the name of the journal that published the study. 

Saugat Bolakhe is a freelance science journalist. He studied zoology as an undergraduate in Nepal and received a master’s degree from the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at the City University of New York. His work has appeared in Scientific American, Nature, New Scientist, Quanta, Eos, Discover, Knowable and other publications.

More by Saugat Bolakhe
Scientific American Magazine Vol 328 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Shape-Shifters” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 328 No. 4 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0423-16b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe