New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Scientists Release Data Backing Hepatitis B Vaccines for Newborns Ahead of Crucial Vaccine Panel Vote

The review was carried out and released by the Vaccine Integrity Project, which is dedicated to bolstering vaccines in the U.S.

Doctor with protective face mask and gloves is preparing vaccine for HBV - Hepatitis - stock photo

101cats via Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A group of vaccine scientists on Tuesday released a report that staunchly supports giving the hepatitis B vaccine to newborns. The review, which included data from more than 400 studies and other reports, found that the vaccine has slashed infections in children by more than 95 percent.

“The totality of evidence—epidemiologic, clinical, and operational—supports maintaining universal hepatitis B vaccination within 24 hours of birth for all medically stable infants,” the authors concluded in a public comment about the report.

Hepatitis B is a liver disease caused by the hepatitis virus and spread through bodily fluids. Chronic infections can cause liver cancer, and the infection can be fatal.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The release comes days ahead of a vote on whether to change the guidance on the hep B shot for newborns slated for later this week by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s vaccine advisory panel. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has informed CDC policy for years; earlier this year, the 17-person committee was fired and restocked with health secretary and noted vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s handpicked advisers, many of whom have also expressed doubts over well-established vaccines.

The vaccine panel is widely expected to vote to shift the timing of the vaccine from birth until later in childhood, but experts have said that the delay will endanger children. A separate preprint modeling study posted to medRxiv on November 25 found that if the vaccine were to be delayed by just two months, some 1,400 babies would become chronically infected with hepatitis B.

“Delaying the first dose would reduce protection for infants and increase the risk of avoidable [hep B] infections, undermining decades of progress in hepatitis B prevention and U.S. efforts to eliminate viral hepatitis as a public health threat,” the report authors wrote in their public comment.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe