New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Investigating Serotonin's Role in SIDS

Mice reveal how changes to the regulatory system can be fatal

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The leading cause of infant death in developed countries, sudden infant death syndrome, is still largely a medical mystery. Past studies have revealed that in the brain stems of more than half of infants who die from SIDS, the neurons that produce serotonin—a chemical responsible for regulating heart rate, body temperature and mood—are overly prevalent and abnormally shaped. Until now, no one has known how these problems might cause death, but a July 4 Science study reveals clues about what might be going wrong in SIDS and how doctors might prevent it.

Mood researchers at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory in Monterotondo, Italy, were investigating how serotonin levels affected anxiety-related behavior in mice when they got a surprise. They bred the mice to have too many 5-HT1A receptors, which are known to signal neurons to slow down the release of serotonin when the chemical is abundant in the brain. Having more receptors ultimately lowers serotonin levels and overall serotonin activity.

The team was startled to find that nearly three quarters of the mice died before they turned four months old, typically after suffering sudden drops in heart rate and body temperature so drastic that the complications killed the animals. Although the researchers do not yet know what prompts these crises, co-author Cornelius Gross speculates that they occur when serotonin activity cannot ramp up properly. For instance, serotonin systems are turned off during rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep, so waking is typically accompanied by a rapid increase in serotonin activity. In the mice, Gross explains, the compromised 5-HT1A feedback loop may prevent serotonin neurons from firing when they should, disrupting nervous system function.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If Gross is right, the unexpected findings reveal how a seemingly simple alteration in the serotonin system can lead to infant death. Although SIDS babies have normal 5-HT1A receptors, one of their many other serotonin feedback mechanisms may be malfunctioning in a similar way. If so, the key to preventing SIDS could one day be as simple as finding a way to regulate abnormal serotonin feedback.

Note: This article was originally printed with the title, "Serotonin and SIDS".

SA Mind Vol 19 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Investigating Serotonin's Role in SIDS” in SA Mind Vol. 19 No. 5 (), p. 8
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1008-8b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe