She's 11, Going on 2,500: What an Average Ancient Greek Looked Like

Museumgoers get their first glimpse of an average resident of ancient Greece

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


DNA from a mass grave found in Athens in the mid-1990s helped experts identify typhoid fever as a possible source of the plague that killed off one quarter of the city’s population in the fifth century  B.C. Now Manolis Papa­grig­or­­ak­is, the University of Athens or­­tho­dontist who published the typhoid discovery in 2006, has assisted in restoring the skull of an 11-year-old girl found in that same grave. Known as Myrtis, she is part of the exhi­bit “Myrtis: Face to Face with the Past” at the Archaeological Museum of Thessaloniki in Greece until March 13. Her reconstruction, the first of a layperson from ancient Greece, is described in the January issue of Angle Orthodontist.

Papagrigorakis worked with Oscar Nilsson, an expert on facial reconstruction, who applied a technique often used in forensics that proceeds muscle by muscle. The skull provided the scaffolding for many of the  girl’s features, and her full set of teeth guided her lips. Richard Neave, who reconstructed Philip II, father of Alexander the Great, is often asked what people looked like in ancient times. Myrtis shows the world, he says, that “people haven’t changed.”

Alison McCook is a science writer based in New York City.

More by Alison McCook
Scientific American Magazine Vol 304 Issue 3This article was published with the title “She's 11, Going on 2,500: What an Average Ancient Greek Looked Like” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 304 No. 3 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican032011-6Efgc1jNn58gTBSfmAVUwf

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe