Signals in a Storm: Seeing Brain Cells Communicate

A new computer-imaging technique shows researchers how brain cells communicate—one molecule at a time

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If you could pause time for an instant and make yourself small enough to discern individual molecules, the far right of this image is what you might see when one brain cell communicates with another across a synapse—the point of contact between two nerve cells. How the brain senses, thinks, learns and emotes depends on how all its nerve cells, or neurons, communicate with one another. And as a result, many laboratories are working feverishly to understand how synapses function—and how psychiatric drugs, which target them, improve patients’ lives.

Yet neuroscientists are hobbled by the fact that synapses are extremely complex, vanishingly small and extraordinarily fast. Thanks to the coordinated efforts of over 1,400 types of molecules, one neuron communicates with another by spitting out chem­ical neurotransmitters that carry its message across a thin gap to a receptive surface on its partner. The only way to provide a full account of what goes on at the synapse is to build a computer model that is as realistic as possible. The hope is that running a moment-by-moment, mol­e­cule-­by-mol­e­cule simulation will yield novel insights that could then be tested experimentally.

The computer-generated image, created by Tom Bartol of the Salk Institute for Biological Studies and his colleagues, is a start. It represents a small portion of a three-dimensional reconstruction, four years in the making, of a minuscule cube of nervous tissue in a rat brain. Aside from showing structure, it captures a single dispatch, at the right, from one neuron to another. Individual molecules of the chemical neurotransmitter (yellow) explode out of the synapse formed at the point of contact between an axon (gray) extending from the signaling cell and a dendrite (blue) on the receiver. (The blue-green structure is a nonneuronal cell that aids neurons in their normal function.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One important observation made possible by Bartol’s simulation is that fully one fifth of the volume in this region of the brain is nothing but the space between neighboring cells—space through which neurotransmitters can apparently spread fairly widely. This broad diffusion contradicts the standard picture of the synapse as a site of communication between only two neurons and could potentially alter our under­stand­ing of how information spreads through the brain. 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe