New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Signals in a Storm: Seeing Brain Cells Communicate

A new computer-imaging technique shows researchers how brain cells communicate—one molecule at a time

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If you could pause time for an instant and make yourself small enough to discern individual molecules, the far right of this image is what you might see when one brain cell communicates with another across a synapse—the point of contact between two nerve cells. How the brain senses, thinks, learns and emotes depends on how all its nerve cells, or neurons, communicate with one another. And as a result, many laboratories are working feverishly to understand how synapses function—and how psychiatric drugs, which target them, improve patients’ lives.

Yet neuroscientists are hobbled by the fact that synapses are extremely complex, vanishingly small and extraordinarily fast. Thanks to the coordinated efforts of over 1,400 types of molecules, one neuron communicates with another by spitting out chem­ical neurotransmitters that carry its message across a thin gap to a receptive surface on its partner. The only way to provide a full account of what goes on at the synapse is to build a computer model that is as realistic as possible. The hope is that running a moment-by-moment, mol­e­cule-­by-mol­e­cule simulation will yield novel insights that could then be tested experimentally.

The computer-generated image, created by Tom Bartol of the Salk Institute for Biological Studies and his colleagues, is a start. It represents a small portion of a three-dimensional reconstruction, four years in the making, of a minuscule cube of nervous tissue in a rat brain. Aside from showing structure, it captures a single dispatch, at the right, from one neuron to another. Individual molecules of the chemical neurotransmitter (yellow) explode out of the synapse formed at the point of contact between an axon (gray) extending from the signaling cell and a dendrite (blue) on the receiver. (The blue-green structure is a nonneuronal cell that aids neurons in their normal function.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One important observation made possible by Bartol’s simulation is that fully one fifth of the volume in this region of the brain is nothing but the space between neighboring cells—space through which neurotransmitters can apparently spread fairly widely. This broad diffusion contradicts the standard picture of the synapse as a site of communication between only two neurons and could potentially alter our under­stand­ing of how information spreads through the brain. 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe