New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Simple Wristbands May Track Seizure Risk

An M.I.T. Media Lab professor talks about new wristbands that measure seizures

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

PROFILE

Name:
Rosalind Picard

Title:
Director of affective computing research, M.I.T. Media Lab


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Location:
Cambridge, Mass.

How did this project start?

We built our first sweatband sensor to get emotional information from autistic children outside the lab. But then one of my undergrad researchers asked if he could borrow a wristband for his little brother who had autism. When he came back, we looked at the data and saw this weird peak on one side of [the boy's] body. It turned out that was 20 minutes before his little brother had a seizure.

How do they work?

These bands put a tiny current through the surface of the skin at the sweatband and measure changes in that electric current. The changes show how the brain is reacting to things in a much more detailed way than, say, a heart rate monitor. Sometimes someone's brain might be reacting, but the person doesn't get sweaty or have a higher heart rate. But he or she will have increased conductance. The bands are also easier to wear than the standard EEG [electroencephalogram] cap, which has lots of electrodes.

How can parents use these sweatbands?

Right now we cannot predict seizures. We also don't know why some seizures cause death and others don't. One hypothesis is that after a deadly seizure is over, the brain shuts itself down for too long. If I had a child with epilepsy, I would want to know: Is this a big surge or a little surge? It's hard to tell that just by looking. If the surge was big and the brain shut down, then I'd want to get my kid to a doctor.

How can doctors use the bands?

Before, there was no way to get lots of seizure data unless people were willing to wear an EEG all the time. The wristband could give us that information, and then we could try interventions

Rose Eveleth is a writer and producer who explores how humans tangle with science and technology. She's the creator and host Flash Forward, a podcast about possible (and not so possible) futures, and has covered everything from fake tumbleweed farms to million dollar baccarat heists.

More by Rose Eveleth
Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 1This article was published with the title “It's Electric” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 1 (), p. 22
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0712-22b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe