So, You Want to Be a Synesthete?

Several “artificial” approaches exist but most evidence suggests that training cannot capture a synesthete’s experience

Cross-stitchers learn to link numbers and colors much like a grapheme-color synesthete. But an fMRI scan conducted while both types of subjects added numbers showed that a synesthete (left) had more activity in visual areas than a stitcher did (right).

FROM “DISSOCIATING SEMANTIC AND PERCEPTUAL COMPONENTS OF SYNAESTHESIA: BEHAVIOURAL AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROANATOMICAL INVESTIGATIONS,” BY LORIN J. ELIAS ET AL., IN COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, VOL. 16, NO. 2; APRIL 2003

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Tasting words, smelling shapes and other synesthetic experiences can have their advantages. The condition has long been linked to creativity—as the lists of famous artists, writers and musicians with synesthesia would suggest—and the strange sensory overlaps may also boost memory. All of which leads many nonsynesthetes to wonder whether they could learn to see sound and taste letters.

There are several “artificial” approaches to synesthesia—sensory deprivation or psychedelic drugs, for instance, are purported to achieve a similar effect—but in most “natural” cases there is clearly a genetic component. Still, learned experience plays an important role in establishing specific sensory associations. This fact can help explain why, for example, people who see letters in color often see A, a frequently used letter, in red, a common hue.

Some experiments suggest people can be trained to acquire synesthetic experiences. In 2014 psychologist Nicolas Rothen and his colleagues, all then at the University of Sussex in England, signed up 14 volunteers—who had no personal history of synesthesia—for an intensive training course in which they were taught 13 letter-color associations. After nine weeks the participants started seeing letters in color even outside the laboratory. But the results of other similar studies were mixed, with several failing to train people to experience any form of synesthesia.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In one case report, a nonsynesthete spent eight years mastering the art of cross-stitching, in which numbers signify the use of specific thread colors (for example, “3” means “red”). When the nonsynesthete's performance on connecting colors with numbers was compared with that of a synesthete, the two were basically indistinguishable. But there was a catch. During functional MRI tests, their brains lit up very differently, suggesting that the experience of the synesthete was unlike that of the trained person. What is unique to synesthesia, the authors conclude, are “photisms”—involuntary, hallucinationlike sensations of light or color.

In 2014 Rothen and psychologist Beat Meier of the University of Bern in Switzerland reviewed the seven synesthesia-training studies published to date. They concluded that even if we can train some aspects of synesthesia so some people can mimic these sensations, the true experience probably remains out of reach for most of us.

Marta Zaraska is a freelance writer based in France and author of Growing Young: How Friendship, Optimism and Kindness Can Help You Live to 100 (Appetite by Random House, 2020). She wrote “Shrinking Animals” in the June 2018 issue of Scientific American.

More by Marta Zaraska
SA Mind Vol 27 Issue 6This article was published with the title “So, You Want to Be a Synesthete?” in SA Mind Vol. 27 No. 6 (), p. 69
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1116-69

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe