New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Spherical Eats

The chemistry of encased mussels and other edible orbs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A few years ago the renowned chef Ferran Adrià presented diners at his restaurant, elBulli, with a simple dish of bright-orange caviar—or rather what looked like caviar: when the guests bit into the orbs, they burst into a mouthful of cantaloupe juice. Since that legendary bit of culinary trompe l’oeil, Adrià and other avant-garde chefs have created many more otherworldly dishes, including mussels that Adrià encases in transparent globes of their own juice.

Eating these spherical foods can evoke childlike joy as you roll the smooth balls around your mouth and explode them with your tongue. But making such confections is not so simple; a lot of chemistry goes into the process.

Chefs have developed two ways to go about it: direct and reverse spherification. Both methods exploit the fact that some gelling mixtures do not set unless ions, charged molecules, are present.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the direct approach, the chef blends the food into a puree or broth that contains a gelling agent, such as sodium alginate or iota carrageenan, but that lacks coagulating ions. The cook separately prepares a setting bath that contains a source of the missing ions, such as calcium gluconate. As soon as droplets or spoonfuls of the food fall into the bath, gelling begins.

Surface tension pulls the beads into their distinctive round shape. A short dip in the bath yields liquid-filled balls encased in tissue-thin skin; a long soak produces chewy beads. The cook stops the gelling process by rinsing the beads and heating them to 85 degrees Celsius (185 degrees Fahrenheit) for 10 minutes.

Reverse spherification inverts the process: calcium lactate or some other source of calcium ions is added to the edible liquid or puree—unless the food is naturally rich in calcium. The bath contains unset gel made with deionized or distilled water, which is calcium-free. When the food goes in, the bath solution itself forms a skin of gel around it. The culinary team at our lab has used spherification to make marbles of crystal-clear tomato water that enclose smaller spheres of basil oil. We have also found that this technique is a terrific way to make a very convincing-looking raw “egg” out of little more than water, ham broth (for the white) and melon juice (for the yolk). It tastes much better than it looks.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe