New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Stingrays Move Thousands of Tons of Sand on the Seafloor per Year

In search of snacks, stingrays’ feeding technique supports ecosystems by rearranging the underwater geography

Drone imagery of feeding stingrays

Drone imagery of a fever of estuary stingrays feeding in seagrass meadows.

Molly Grew

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

With their winglike fins undulating in slow motion, stingrays and other rays seem to fly gracefully through the water. But these elegant fins can also serve a startling, earthier purpose: rays use them to push an astonishing quantity of sand around the seafloor. In Australia’s Brisbane Water estuary, these fish shifted an amount of sand equivalent to the weight of two Eiffel Towers over the course of a year.

This finding, published in June in Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, underscores rays’ importance in keeping key nutrients moving through seabed ecosystems, the researchers say.

Rays, of which stingrays are one subgroup, are a type of cartilaginous fish called batoids that inhabit both freshwater and marine habitats throughout the world. Many species eat mollusks, worms and other invertebrates that hide under the sand of the seafloor. To expose them, most rays hover over one spot, flap their winglike pectoral fins and spurt water from their mouth and gills to displace the sand directly beneath them until they find a meal. This process pockmarks the seafloor with huge numbers of “feeding pits,” craters about the size of the ray itself, and makes these fish structural engineers of their ecosystems.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Drone image of a stingray and feeding pits

Drone imagery of an estuary stingray swimming over sand flats, surrounded by feeding pits.

Molly Grew

Populations of the estuary stingray (Hemitrygon fluviorum), which can grow to 130 centimeters (or about four feet) across and are found only in Australia, have been plummeting because of fishing, habitat degradation and climate change—and researchers are concerned that their loss could impact the entire Brisbane Water estuary. For one thing, these rays’ peculiar hunting technique helps cycle nutrients and oxygen that many other organisms need. Without the rays, “that sand can become anoxic, and nothing can live in it,” says team member Molly Grew, a Ph.D. student at the University of Newcastle in Australia and lead author of the new study. So she and her colleagues tried to measure how much sand these fish were actually moving.

Previously, researchers would have had to venture underwater and measure the area’s hundreds of underwater feeding pits by hand to calculate how much sand was displaced. But Grew and her colleagues found that they could use an aerial drone, three-dimensional computer modeling and aerial images of the estuary to do the math.

They discovered that over seven days the inhabitant rays created 1,090 feeding pits and moved nearly eight tons of sand—in a mere 2 percent of their feeding areas within the estuary. And that’s a conservative estimate because the team only measured pits that were visible from above. “This,” Grew emphasizes, “is not even scratching the surface of how much sand they actually move.” Based on this estimate, the researchers calculated that in the entire estuary, the rays displace more than 20,000 tons of sand per year.

A small sandy island

Drone imagery of the study location, Pelican's Spot in the Brisbane Water estuary in Australia.

Molly Grew

Ray conservation biologist Kathryn Flowers, who was not involved in the research, cautions that “we shouldn’t jump to conclusions about the ecological importance of stingrays based solely on their high sediment turnover rates.” She notes that currents, tides, wind and other organisms also contribute significantly to sand displacement.*

Still, because little is known about these rays, scientists need more research like this to better understand what role rays play in their ecosystems, Flowers says. “Studies like this one,” she says, “offer the first clues to solving these mysteries.”

*Editor’s Note (7/23/24): This sentence was edited after posting to better clarify Kathryn Flowers’s comments on contributions to sand displacement.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe