Stress Kills Brain Cells Off

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Stress is a killer—at least for brain cells. A new animal study shows that a single socially stressful situation can destroy newly created neurons in the hippocampus, the brain region involved in memory and emotion.

Although most of the brain stops growing by adulthood, new nerve cells are continually generated in the hippocampus, where they are essential for learning. Scientists have long known that chronic stress can inhibit this neurogenesis and lead to depression. Daniel Peterson and his colleagues at the Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science wanted to find out how the brain reacted to just a single stressful episode.

The team placed a young adult rat into a cage with two older rats that quickly began to
attack the newcomer. When they removed the younger animal 20 minutes later, the researchers found that its stress hormone levels were six times as high as those of other rats that had not experienced the terrifying encounter. Examining the young rat’s brain, they saw that it had produced as many new neurons as its unstressed counterparts. Yet when they repeated the experiment with different rats and examined their brains after a week, only a third of newly generated cells had survived.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The finding that a single stressful event can have an impact on the survival of newborn neurons could lead to new depression treatments for humans, Peterson says. “It may
become possible to prevent that loss because we have found that little window of time to intervene.”
 

SA Mind Vol 18 Issue 3This article was published with the title “...And Stress Kills Them Off” in SA Mind Vol. 18 No. 3 (), p. 10
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0607-10b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe