Switching off the Inner Scrooge

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Self-serving impulses and moral considerations often act as two opposing forces that govern our everyday behavior. But how does the brain decide which one wins?

As a step toward answering that question, Ernst Fehr of the University of Zurich and his colleagues watched as 52 volunteers played the ultimatum game, an anonymous exchange in which an individual decides whether to punish a partner's behavior at his or her own cost. In this version of the game, one player proposes how to divide 20 Swiss francs with the second player. If the responder accepts, the first player gets the money demanded and the responder gets the rest. But if the responder rejects a lopsided offer, neither gets anything. “In this game, players must overcome selfish impulses if they want to punish their partners for an unfair offer,” Fehr explains.

To test how the brain regulates the control of these impulses, the researchers disrupted the activity of the right or left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), a brain region known to be involved in self-control. Using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, a technique that delivers short magnetic pulses that penetrate the skull and temporarily disrupt neural firing, the team inhibited the DLPFC in 36 responders while they were making their decision. The remaining 16 players served as a control group.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers found that turning off the right side of the DLPFC made the volunteers much more likely to accept highly uneven splits, even though they still judged these offers as unfair. “That suggests that right DLPFC activity is crucial when it comes to the ability to override selfish impulses,” says Fehr, adding that dysfunctions of this brain region may cause certain mental disorders characterized by excessive selfishness.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe