New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Switching off the Inner Scrooge

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Self-serving impulses and moral considerations often act as two opposing forces that govern our everyday behavior. But how does the brain decide which one wins?

As a step toward answering that question, Ernst Fehr of the University of Zurich and his colleagues watched as 52 volunteers played the ultimatum game, an anonymous exchange in which an individual decides whether to punish a partner's behavior at his or her own cost. In this version of the game, one player proposes how to divide 20 Swiss francs with the second player. If the responder accepts, the first player gets the money demanded and the responder gets the rest. But if the responder rejects a lopsided offer, neither gets anything. “In this game, players must overcome selfish impulses if they want to punish their partners for an unfair offer,” Fehr explains.

To test how the brain regulates the control of these impulses, the researchers disrupted the activity of the right or left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), a brain region known to be involved in self-control. Using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, a technique that delivers short magnetic pulses that penetrate the skull and temporarily disrupt neural firing, the team inhibited the DLPFC in 36 responders while they were making their decision. The remaining 16 players served as a control group.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers found that turning off the right side of the DLPFC made the volunteers much more likely to accept highly uneven splits, even though they still judged these offers as unfair. “That suggests that right DLPFC activity is crucial when it comes to the ability to override selfish impulses,” says Fehr, adding that dysfunctions of this brain region may cause certain mental disorders characterized by excessive selfishness.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe