New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Teen AI Chatbot Use Surges, Raising Mental Health Concerns

A new survey offers the clearest national snapshot yet of how U.S. teens are using artificial intelligence

Concept art of an anthropomorphic pink chatbot popping out of a phone

MR.Cole_Photographer/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Artificial intelligence chatbots are no longer a novelty for U.S. teenagers. They’re a habit.

A new Pew Research Center survey of 1,458 teens between the ages of 13 and 17 found that 64 percent have used an AI chatbot, with more than one in four using such tools daily. Of those daily users, more than half talked to chatbots with a frequency ranging from several times a day to nearly constantly.

The results offer a national snapshot of what is a fast-moving landscape, as chatbots become increasingly embedded in teens’ lives while policymakers argue over how to best regulate them.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


	Stacked bar chart shows percentage of teens who use chatbots almost constantly, several times a day, about once a day, several times a week, less often and not at all.

Amanda Montañez; Source: Pew Research Center (data)

ChatGPT was the most popular bot among teens by a wide margin: 59 percent of survey respondents said they used OpenAI’s flagship AI-powered tool, placing it far above Google’s Gemini (used by 23 percent of respondents) and Meta AI (used by 20 percent). Black and Hispanic teens were slightly more likely than their white peers to use chatbots every day. Interestingly, these patterns reflect how adults tend to use AI, too, although teens seem more likely to turn to it overall.

Bar chart shows percentage of teens who use chatbots by gender, age group and race or ethnicity.

Amanda Montañez; Source: Pew Research Center (data)

The report comes amid rising concern over AI’s effect on teens’ mental health. And several AI companies, including ChatGPT maker OpenAI, face legal action tied to teens’ use of their chatbots. The same features that make chatbots appealing—the always-on availability, the seemingly empathetic conversation, the projection of confidence—can lead teens to turn to them for support or mental health guidance instead of a human. Given the scale of daily usage that Pew found, the real question isn’t whether adolescents will use AI but what kind of design features, safeguards and age limits they might encounter when they do.

Bar chart shows percentage of teens who use ChatGPT, Gemini, Meta AI, Copilot, character.ai and Claude.

Amanda Montañez; Source: Pew Research Center (data)

Lawmakers are also confronting that reality. In recent days, U.S. president Donald Trump has teased a “ONE RULE” executive order aimed at curbing a state-by-state patchwork of AI laws. Meanwhile senators in D.C. are floating legislation to ban the use of AI companions among minors. Abroad, Australia has begun enforcing a ban on under-age-16 social media accounts—a sign of how governments are trying to redraw age lines as youth-facing technology keeps changing.

Still, Pew’s numbers show that many teens have made up their minds about AI while the rules are still being argued into existence.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe