Researchers Gain New Insights into the Mystery of Thalidomide-Caused Birth Defects

Despite a history of causing fetal malformations, thalidomide is FDA-approved for some conditions, so clues are welcome as to how the drug, formerly used as a sedative and now for immunomodulatory therapy, works

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Half a century ago, thousands ofpregnant women in 46 countries took a drug for morning sickness that would later be discovered to cause severe malformations in developing fetuses. Worldwide, roughly 10,000 affected children nicknamed "thalidomide babies" were born with multiple defects, including the characteristic shortened upper limbs (a condition known as phocomelia, Greek for "seal limbs"), before the drug was discontinued in 1961 after four years on the market.

More recently, thalidomide has made a comeback. In the 1990s the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved its use in the treatment of both multiple myeloma (a form of cancer that affects plasma cells) and the complications of leprosy. The drug's potent anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic (blood vessel-forming) effects make it therapeutically attractive despite its nasty side effects. (Obviously, it is not recommended for women who might be pregnant.) Today, thalidomide trials are ongoing in more than 30 diseases, according to Adis R&D Insight (an online database of drug developments), including arthritis, breast cancer and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. But the details of how the drug works remain unclear.

A new study published in the March 12 issue of Science has identified one primary target of thalidomide's teratogenicity (potential to cause fetal malformations)—a protein called cereblon. Using zebra fish and chick embryos, Takumi Ito and colleagues from the Tokyo Institute of Technology showed that thalidomide binds to cereblon, causing pectoral fin malformations in zebra fish and the complete absence of forelimbs in chicks. The researchers concluded that thalidomide exerts these effects by inhibiting cereblon function, because genetically induced overproduction of cereblon prevented the malformations. Cereblon's normal function is unknown, but mutations in the gene encoding it are implicated in mild mental retardation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Previous studies have suggested that thalidomide's therapeutic effects on inflammation, blood vessel formation and cell stress might be partly responsible for its teratogenicity, meaning that eliminating its toxic side effects might also reduce its effectiveness. But little has been reported about thalidomide's direct molecular targets. Ito and colleagues hope the identification of cereblon as a target for thalidomide teratogenicity will lead to rapid screening for similar, safer alternatives. "Because thalidomide is now used for the treatment of multiple myeloma and leprosy, identification of its direct target may allow rational design of more effective thalidomide derivatives without teratogenic activity ," they report.

A safe substitute for thalidomide would be well received. Although the FDA has approved limited thalidomide use, the World Health Organization (WHO) does not recommend it, citing worries over ineffective surveillance and drug misuse. "Today, a number of thalidomide babies continue to be born each year reflecting regulatory insufficiency and widespread use under inadequate supervision," the organization's Web site states. In a related report former WHO Global Leprosy Program team leader Vijaykumar Pannikar wrote, "It cannot be overemphasized that any potential benefit with thalidomide must be balanced with the known toxicity and the accompanying ethical and legal constraints on its use."

 

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe