New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Government Is Racing to Put Your Toilet Under Surveillance—For a Good Reason

A relatively new type of snooping—we will call it poop snooping—could help us all react more quickly to new variants of the COVID-causing coronavirus or future pandemics

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Over the past year, as people stopped making appointments with health care providers to check for COVID and shifted to taking home tests instead, health officials lost their tight grip on case tallies. And in turn, it became tougher to spot a new viral variant or wave of the pandemic. Thankfully epidemiologists had a solution—in poop, or rather sewage.

In September 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention established the National Wastewater Surveillance System (NWSS) with the goal of collecting and testing local levels of the virus that causes COVID at treatment plants across the country. While the idea of turning to poop for data might seem desperate, the process is fairly high-tech: wastewater treatment facilities pump out small samples, which are then shipped to public and private labs for further examination.

Watch the Film


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At one such place, Biobot Analytics, technicians sift out the viral particles using nanoscale magnetic beads and then run them through aPCR machine—the same device used for the most accurate type of COVID testing. Algorithms parse the results, factoring in local wastewater flow rates and other viral markers, while filtering out the noisy outliers to produce a crystal-clear concentration of COVID-causing virus ineach sample.

Using such processes, the CDC and Biobot have learned to polish once dirty data into a useful public resource that can accurately reflect disease trends. And over the past two years, the CDC and its partners have built up the network of local testing sites to track the sewage of more than a third of the country.

The monitoring system has given local public health officials and hospitals much needed insights into where to invest in increased testing and other health measures while helping ordinary citizens better understand when to take personal precautions.

The scientific testing techniques and reporting system have been so successful that the CDC is now aiming to expand its efforts to track other pathogens, such as flu viruses and salmonella, in hopes of responding more quickly to future regional outbreaks. According to Amy Kirby, program lead of NWSS, “If we have the system already in place, when the next pandemic hits, we’ll be ready to get data coming in within weeks.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe