The Government Is Racing to Put Your Toilet Under Surveillance—For a Good Reason

A relatively new type of snooping—we will call it poop snooping—could help us all react more quickly to new variants of the COVID-causing coronavirus or future pandemics

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Over the past year, as people stopped making appointments with health care providers to check for COVID and shifted to taking home tests instead, health officials lost their tight grip on case tallies. And in turn, it became tougher to spot a new viral variant or wave of the pandemic. Thankfully epidemiologists had a solution—in poop, or rather sewage.

In September 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention established the National Wastewater Surveillance System (NWSS) with the goal of collecting and testing local levels of the virus that causes COVID at treatment plants across the country. While the idea of turning to poop for data might seem desperate, the process is fairly high-tech: wastewater treatment facilities pump out small samples, which are then shipped to public and private labs for further examination.

Watch the Film


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At one such place, Biobot Analytics, technicians sift out the viral particles using nanoscale magnetic beads and then run them through aPCR machine—the same device used for the most accurate type of COVID testing. Algorithms parse the results, factoring in local wastewater flow rates and other viral markers, while filtering out the noisy outliers to produce a crystal-clear concentration of COVID-causing virus ineach sample.

Using such processes, the CDC and Biobot have learned to polish once dirty data into a useful public resource that can accurately reflect disease trends. And over the past two years, the CDC and its partners have built up the network of local testing sites to track the sewage of more than a third of the country.

The monitoring system has given local public health officials and hospitals much needed insights into where to invest in increased testing and other health measures while helping ordinary citizens better understand when to take personal precautions.

The scientific testing techniques and reporting system have been so successful that the CDC is now aiming to expand its efforts to track other pathogens, such as flu viruses and salmonella, in hopes of responding more quickly to future regional outbreaks. According to Amy Kirby, program lead of NWSS, “If we have the system already in place, when the next pandemic hits, we’ll be ready to get data coming in within weeks.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe