The Little Engine That Could

Researchers have built the world's tiniest motor

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For a long time the smallest motor in the world was 200 nanometers across. That’s really small, about one-fortieth the size of a red blood cell. Charles Sykes and his team at Tufts University have now crushed that rec­ord. Their motor is just a single molecule, one nanometer across. Unlike other, bigger motors, this one isn’t driven by chemical reactions or light—it runs on electricity.  “A lot of designs have been proposed,” says Johannes Seldenthuis, a researcher at the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, “but this has really been the first one that’s actually worked.”

Here is how Sykes and his team did it: the motor—a single molecule of butyl methyl sulfide (BuSMe), which is made up of a sulfur atom with four carbon atoms on one side and one carbon atom on the other—was placed on a copper surface. The researchers then lowered a scanning electron microscope very close to that surface. The electrons flowed out of the tip of the microscope, exciting the electrons in the BuSMe molecule and causing it to rotate back and forth. But because the molecule is asymmetrical, it tended to spin in one direction slightly more than the other. Little by little, the excited molecule moved along the plate.

Although that might not sound like a motor, it resembles what is inside the human body. “If you watch biological motors, they don’t look like they’re doing anything useful—they just jitter around,” Sykes says. Our bodies are populated with similar structures. The cell wall is littered with pumps that move ions into and out of the cell. Others move things from one place to another within the cell.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That is why this single-molecule motor is significant. Says Sykes: “If you can operate them in a controlled way, you have a whole host of things you can do.” If researchers could reliably build replicas of the pumps in our cell walls, they could do experiments on those pumps extremely efficiently, shrinking their setups to fit onto small chips and reducing the amount of space, cost and time required for each test.

Rose Eveleth is a writer and producer who explores how humans tangle with science and technology. She's the creator and host Flash Forward, a podcast about possible (and not so possible) futures, and has covered everything from fake tumbleweed farms to million dollar baccarat heists.

More by Rose Eveleth
Scientific American Magazine Vol 306 Issue 1This article was published with the title “The Little Engine That Could” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 306 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican012012-3owsKPxgZ6I9ITVal3h8IM

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe