The Oldest Deep-Sea Fish Discovered in Fossil Traces

Ancient fish followed prey into the crushing pressures of the deep ocean

Face of a fish emerging from the sand.

A modern-day floor-dwelling fish (Synodus intermedius).

Wild Horizons/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The strange life-forms lurking in Earth's deepest seas may seem primordial, as if they are as old as the oceans themselves. But the truth is that these fish and other animals took hundreds of millions of years to adapt to the pressure, cold and darkness of the depths, and a recent study helps pinpoint vertebrates' entry into this inky realm. The rarity of deep-sea fossils had previously left paleontologists with only a patchy understanding of life in the ancient deep. Now fossilized feeding traces created by hungry fish, described in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, indicate they were swimming in the deep seas by 130 million years ago.

The telltale fossils were first discovered a decade ago in Italy's Palombini Shale Formation, which once lay roughly 6,500 feet below the surface of the Cretaceous seas. These fossils didn't preserve the ancient fish themselves but rather recorded their behavior: the fish left behind a variety of pits, scrapes and sinuous trails in the sediments on the ocean floor.

No one knew what to make of these markings at first. “It took more than 10 years to realize the true nature of the trace fossils,” says Andrea Baucon, a paleontologist at the University of Genoa. But after he observed modern Mediterranean fish creating similar structures, he says, “a light went on in my head.” By studying the behavior of living fish, Baucon and his colleagues identified what probably created the ancient marks. The pits, for example, appear to have been made by fish that could jet water at the sediment to reveal hiding prey. The distinctive two-lobed scrapes were created by fish mouthing at the bottom to catch worms, and the S-shaped trails were created by a fish flicking its tail back and forth as it swam just above the seafloor. The results suggest that several fish species were living in deep waters and hunting for squishy prey by the Early Cretaceous period—37 million years earlier than indicated by previous fossil evidence of deep-sea vertebrates.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“The study is a superb example of how trace fossils can fill huge gaps in our understanding,” says Emory University paleontologist Anthony Martin, who was not involved in the work.

This updated time line also hints at why fish adapted to such ocean extremes—they may have been following their wormlike invertebrate prey, Baucon says. These invertebrates spread because of changes in the nutrients available in the ocean's depths. Deep-sea fish are carnivores, explains marine biologist Elizabeth Miller of the University of Oklahoma, who was not involved in the work. So “without something to eat [besides] each other, it's difficult to imagine fishes making a living in the deep sea.”

Riley Black, who formerly wrote under the name Brian Switek, is the author of Skeleton Keys and My Beloved Brontosaurus. She lives in Salt Lake City, Utah. Follow her on Twitter @Laelaps and on Instagram @laelaps

More by Riley Black
Scientific American Magazine Vol 329 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Into the Deep” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 329 No. 5 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1223-16b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe