New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Surprising Architecture in Bees’ Honeycombs

The insects’ hives are more complicated than researchers thought

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Charles Darwin described bees' ability to build perfect honeycombs as “the most wonderful of all known instincts.” Each hexagonal cell is so precisely constructed and so neatly arrayed that a comb is a visual treat. Now new research into how honeybees incorporate different cell sizes into a flawless-looking grid—and seamlessly merge combs built from multiple directions at once—reveals remarkable adaptability.

Adjacent honey storage cells are typically uniform in size, but bees must build some larger cells for rearing drones and smaller ones for workers. They also have to align and join comb grids being constructed from separate starting points. Understanding how bees accomplish all of this so elegantly “is an old quest,” says Auburn University behavioral ecologist Michael Smith.

Credit: Brown Bird Design; Source: “Imperfect Comb Construction Reveals the Architectural Abilities of Honeybees,” by Michael L. Smith, Nils Napp and Kirstin H. Peterson, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Vol. 118; August 3, 2021


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Smith and his colleagues measured 19,000 comb cells from 12 colonies of Italian honeybees. Using automated image analysis, they examined the centers and vertices of these cells to find variations in their shapes and sizes. “We just couldn't extract the precise measurement of thousands of cells until we had this new automated method,” Smith says.

The researchers found that bees made clever adjustments to transition between sizes and merge combs as cleanly as possible. The insects utilized patterns of irregular shapes (mostly pairs of heptagons and pentagons) and manipulated comb cells' size and orientation so craftily that their ability can be considered “a true architectural skill,” the researchers write.

“The hexagonal grid structure of a honeycomb—constructed by a leaderless collective of hundreds of bees—lends itself to speculation that robotic, innate behavior must be at work,” says Queen Mary University entomologist Lars Chittka, who was not involved with the study. “But a simple robot does not have such a level of adaptability and rate of error recovery.”

Raghavendra Gadagkar, who studies insect behavior at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, and who was also not part of the study, suggests that examining how bees coordinate comb building can help advance robotics. “Imagine,” he says, “if we could program such wits of honeybees in real-world robots.”

Saugat Bolakhe is a freelance science journalist. He studied zoology as an undergraduate in Nepal and received a master’s degree from the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at the City University of New York. His work has appeared in Scientific American, Nature, New Scientist, Quanta, Eos, Discover, Knowable and other publications.

More by Saugat Bolakhe
Scientific American Magazine Vol 325 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Active Architects” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 325 No. 5 (), p. 19
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1121-19

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe