Tiny Antennas Made from DNA Light Up Protein Activity

A new method for monitoring proteins could lead to better drug development

DNA antennas.

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Developing drugs can be hit or miss, but now a tiny, DNA-based sensor may help streamline the task. Acting as a “fluorescent nanoantenna,” the sensor could flag in real time if a prospective drug is binding to its target or reveal other cellular activity.

Cells use protein molecules to communicate with one another and trigger functions throughout the body. When such a message comes into contact with a cell’s surface protein, one of the molecules involved changes shape like a lock opened by a key, prompting a reaction. At just five nanometers across—one 200th the length of a typical bacterium—fluorescent nanoantennas can bind to and interact with proteins on a molecular level. Each nanoantenna can target a particular protein; when that protein changes shape, the bound nanoantenna shifts as well and emits specific light when viewed under a fluorescence microscope.

For a study in Nature Methods, researchers put these new nanoantennas to work flagging when a particular digestive protein executed five different activities in a solution, such as reacting to antibodies and changing intestinal acidity. “It’s a nice tool in our toolbox,” says the study’s senior author Alexis Vallée-Bélisle, a nanotechnology researcher at the Université de Montréal.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Other researchers have built nanoantennas from metals that attach to any protein encountered. But the new antennas’ DNA-based structure can be programmed to adhere to a specific protein—or region on a protein—based on a sequence of building blocks called nucleotides. “They’re like Legos,” says Mina Yeşilyurt, a physicist at the Leibniz Institute of Photonic Technology who was not involved in the study. “You can create endless combinations.”

Sensing structural changes in specific molecules has big implications for drug development, the study authors say. Vallée-Bélisle uses the example of a protein involved in turning cells cancerous. Researchers could introduce fluorescent nanoantennas to monitor whether a drug successfully blocks the cancer-causing protein from binding to a healthy cell analogue in the lab.

Fluorescent nanoantennas are still subject to many of the same limitations as older techniques, such as false positives that arise when proteins unfold because of interference from the antennas themselves. “There is no silver bullet that solves all of the problems in these things,” says Ahmet Ali Yanik, a nanoplasmonics engineer at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who was not involved with the research.

But Yanik does think the approach will be useful—especially given its relative affordability compared with other ways of monitoring proteins, such as x-ray crystallography. “Every biology lab has a fluorescence microscope,” he says. “So it’s definitely a technique that can catch on.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe