New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Touch Screens Redefine the Market—Working Knowledge on Smart Phones

Taking apart the Apple iPhone and the BlackBerry Storm

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In 2007, when Apple released the iPhone, its big touch screen made it an instant hit. The phone operated exclusively on AT&T’s wireless network in the U.S., and other network providers implored their phone makers to quickly devise competitors. The scramble was on, and the touch-screen alternatives blossomed during the 2008 holiday season. Suddenly available were Research in Motion’s Blackberry Storm, which operates over Verizon’s network, HTC’s G1 (T-Mobile), the Samsung Instinct (Sprint), and others—most retailing for about $200.

Each of these offerings can be called a smart phone, which generally means the technology is robust enough to provide a range of services beyond cell phone calls and text messaging and often means the operating system is open to third-party software developers seeking to create more novel features. The smart phones increasingly communicate over so-called 3G cellular networks that allow faster Web browsing and sending and receiving of e-mail. But the touch screens are the primary consumer draw. “Every provider now has a showcase phone that it is promoting heavily, to try to compete with the iPhone,” says Ross Rubin, director of industry analysis at NPD Group, a market research firm in Port Washington, N.Y.

The handsets are crammed with hardware such as digital photograph and video cameras, music players and the dandy screens. The devices may soon evolve into small computers about the size of a clutch purse. Hewlett-Packard and others have begun offering such “netbooks” with 3G Internet capabilities; cell phone service is expected soon.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Smart phones pack an incredible array of telecommunications capabilities, including e-mail messengers, Web browsers, GPS navigators and, oh, yes, the actual cell phone. And more is to come. “There’s plenty of gas left in the 3G network,” Rubin points out. Eventually, though, the promise of delivering mobile broadband—equivalent to the DSL or cable service most people now enjoy at home—will require an evolution to 4G, which is already being planned under the monikers of LTE (AT&T and Verizon) and WiMAX (Sprint).

When 4G rolls out, carriers might finally open their wireless networks, so consumers could buy phones from different manufacturers that operate on various networks, whether AT&T’s or Verizon’s. The phones would probably be more expensive, because the carriers would not be subsidizing them to lock consumers into a two-year service contract. “You would just pay for monthly or even daily service,” Rubin predicts, “with no penalty for switching.”

Did You Know...
SHAKE IT: Accelerometers have been embedded in touch-screen phones to track when users turn the screens from “portrait” to “landscape” orientation. But their inclusion is allowing new applications, too. When the iPhone displays a list of nearby restaurants, shaking the phone will reorder the entries; the accelerometer can also instruct the camera to take a photograph at night in low light only if the phone is being held steady.

MIDS: Mobile Internet devices, or MIDs, are garnering more interest, as touch screens make cell phones bigger instead of smaller. MIDs are perhaps twice the size of touch-screen phones and are optimized for one function, such as a video camera that can wirelessly upload to the Web, or a mobile video-game console that allows people roaming around the world to play against one another. Intel Corporation is pushing the MID concept and name in part because the company makes a processor called Atom that can drive such devices and is already in very small “netbook” computers optimized for Web browsing.

Note: This article was originally printed with the title, "Touch Screens Redefine the Market".

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti
Scientific American Magazine Vol 300 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Smart Phones: Touch Screens Redefine the Market” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 300 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican022009-7FE7qpGXVPeVejzScx7I8d

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe