Treating Depression: Pills or Talk?

Medication has reduced depression for decades, but newer forms of psychotherapy are proving their worth

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

00

(Further Reading)

  • Three-Year Outcomes for Maintenance Therapies in Recurrent Depression. E. Frank et al. in Archives of General Psychiatry, Vol. 47, No. 12, pages 1093–1099; December 1990.

  • A Comparison of Nefazodone, the Cognitive Behavioral-Analysis System of Psychotherapy, and Their Combination for the Treatment of Chronic Depression. M. B. Keller et al. in New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 342, No. 20, pages 1462–1470; May 18, 2000.

  • Treatment and Prevention of Depression. Steven Hollon, Michael Thase and John Markowitz in Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Vol. 3, No. 2, pages 39–77; November 2002.

Three-Year Outcomes for Maintenance Therapies in Recurrent Depression. E. Frank et al. in Archives of General Psychiatry, Vol. 47, No. 12, pages 1093¿1099; December 1990.

A Comparison of Nefazodone, the Cognitive Behavioral-Analysis System of Psychotherapy, and Their Combination for the Treatment of Chronic Depression. M. B. Keller et al. in New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 342, No. 20, pages 1462¿1470; May 18, 2000.

Treatment and Prevention of Depression. Steven Hollon, Michael Thase and John Markowitz in Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Vol. 3, No. 2, pages 39¿77; November 2002.

SA Mind Vol 14 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Treating Depression: Pills or Talk” in SA Mind Vol. 14 No. 5 (), p. 34
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1204-34

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe