Trump’s order to release evidence for aliens obscures the scientific search for extraterrestrial life

On Thursday the U.S. president ordered the release of federal files related to UFOs and aliens, although no evidence of extraterrestrials visiting Earth is known to exist

Black-and-white photo of four unidentified flying objects (UFOs) above a U.S. power plant

A view of four unidentified flying objects (UFOs) above power plant smokestacks at the Coast Guard Air Station Salem in Salem, Mass., on July 16, 1952. The photograph was taken by U.S. Coast Guard seaman Shell Alpert.

U.S. Coast Guard/Library of Congress/Interim Archives/Getty Images

On Thursday U.S. president Donald Trump announced on his social media platform Truth Social that he would direct the Department of Defense and other federal agencies to “begin the process of identifying and releasing Government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOs), and any and all other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important, matters.”

The directive came after a podcast interview last week in which former president Barack Obama said that he believed aliens were “real” but that he hadn’t seen evidence of them during his presidency.

Speaking to reporters onboard Air Force One on Thursday, Trump criticized Obama’s remarks, alleging that the former president’s comments had disclosed “classified information.” (Trump himself has previously faced charges for improper handling of classified materials.) Trump’s declassification order, the current president said, “may get [Obama] out of trouble.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Sean Kirkpatrick, who served as the first director of the Pentagon’s All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) from 2022 to 2023, tells Scientific American that “Obama said nothing classified and, in fact, said nothing that hasn’t been said in many forums—including in congressional testimony.”

Trump’s announcement also comes hot on the heels of the contentious release of other government documents—a vast, heavily redacted database of materials derived from federal investigations into disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, with whom Trump and many other powerful world figures had been associated.

What do President Trump and former President Obama know about aliens?

Obama has since clarified his views on aliens after his podcast interview caused uproar, saying in an Instagram post that he “saw no evidence during my presidency that extraterrestrials have made contact with us. Really!” The assertion that aliens are real, the former president said, was a matter of statistics: “The universe is so vast that the odds are good there’s life out there,” he wrote. “But the distances between solar systems are so great that the chances we’ve been visited by aliens is low.”

Obama’s view is one echoed by Bill Diamond, president and CEO of the SETI Institute in Mountain View, California, a research organization dedicated to the search for extraterrestrial intelligence and other astrobiology topics. “The statistical probability that we are alone in the universe is zero,” Diamond says.

Trump, for his part, explained to reporters onboard Air Force One that he, too, is in the dark, saying that “I don’t know if they’re real or not.”

Is there evidence that aliens have ever visited Earth?

To date, no U.S. government report or investigation has produced any evidence that extraterrestrials have visited Earth despite many decades of official study tracing back to the mid-20th century. In the past decade, the Pentagon’s AARO, as well as a NASA-commissioned expert panel, have documented sightings of unexplained objects, now generally referred to as unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs), but neither has concluded that any of these incidents are evidence of alien technology or life.

“There is no evidence to suggest that any of these UAP sightings are extraterrestrial in nature,” Kirkpatrick says. “There is, however, a tendency to sensationalize sightings for which there is little hard data.”

Many such events have been ultimately attributed to misidentified aircraft, atmospheric phenomena or sensor artifacts—although experts acknowledge there is much still to learn.

“As a scientist and a member of NASA’s UAP panel, I haven’t seen anything that indicates we have observed phenomena that violate the laws of physics and require an alien society visiting us to be explained,” says Federica Bianco, an astrophysicist at the University of Delaware. “We have shown in our NASA study group that even the most unusual sightings could be explained by known human-built technologies when the right assumptions were made.”

The fact that so many people believe UAPs are evidence of contact with extraterrestrial beings “says much more about human nature than it does about the presence of any compelling evidence suggesting alien visitation,” Diamond adds. “Clearly, as a species we don’t want to be alone.”

Beyond the federal realm, some space scientists such as Avi Loeb, an astrophysicist at Harvard University, and Beatriz Villarroel, a researcher at the Nordic Institute for Theoretical Physics in Sweden, have independently presented claims of evidence for possible alien visitation. Much of Loeb’s focus has been on the surprising behavior of interstellar objects passing through the solar system. Meanwhile Villaroel has argued that lights in the sky that appeared on pre-space-age photographic plates could indicate artificial objects that were in Earth orbit before the launch of humanity’s first satellites.

These claims have been widely met with skepticism by other scientists, with some arguing that these observations can be explained by natural causes or human activity.

Thomas Zurbuchen, an astrophysicist and former associate administrator of NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, who set up the agency’s UAP panel, says that scientific investigations of potential alien encounters should not be inappropriately stigmatized and that the recommendations in the group’s final report still stand.

“It’s a good idea to look at various datasets and to look for unusual activity—and learn from it as much as we can,” he says.

How are scientists searching for extraterrestrials?

The scientific search for extraterrestrial life is alive and well. Loeb, for instance, has launched the Galileo Project, a network of small telescopes and other instruments that could observe and study overflying UAPs. And multiple modest SETI efforts exist to look for electromagnetic transmissions washing over Earth from putative cosmic civilizations. Like all previous searches, these have yet to deliver any conclusive evidence of aliens.

NASA, for its part, has spent decades and billions of dollars on the quest to find life elsewhere in the universe. Most recently, the space agency launched Europa Clipper to scout out the habitability of a moon of Jupiter and developed the flying drone Dragonfly to study the environment of Titan, Saturn’s largest and perhaps most astrobiologically intriguing moon.

But NASA’s most notable search for aliens is probably its effort to identify possible signs of ancient life on Mars and to bring samples back to Earth. The agency’s Mars Sample Return program, however, has been plagued by budget overruns and schedule delays. Earlier this year its funding was zeroed out, effectively canceling the mission.

Meanwhile observations of potentially habitable exoplanets by the James Webb Space Telescope have also uncovered what some scientists have controversially interpreted as possible biosignatures. NASA is now in the midst of developing an even more ambitious telescope, the Habitable Worlds Observatory, that is targeted for the 2030s and could more closely study promising exoplanets for potential signs of life.

“The scale of the search effort in both space and time,” Diamond says, “is vast and challenging—particularly when we don’t quite know exactly what we are looking for or what is the best possible method.”

What happens next?

Trump’s Thursday directive did not specify which government files will be declassified or when they might be made public but rather signaled the start of a process in which officials will review relevant documents and other evidence for potential disclosure. The selection, review, declassification and eventual release of any materials could take weeks, months or even years.

Kirkpatrick expects any release will contain “no new revelations.”

While acknowledging that she lacks access to classified information, astrophysicist Bianco says that “the timing convinces me that this is but a move to distract the people in the United States from multiple ongoing political and societal crises and the failures of this administration.”

Lee Billings is a science journalist specializing in astronomy, physics, planetary science, and spaceflight and is senior desk editor for physical science at Scientific American. He is author of a critically acclaimed book, Five Billion Years of Solitude: The Search for Life Among the Stars, which in 2014 won a Science Communication Award from the American Institute of Physics. In addition to his work for Scientific American, Billings’s writing has appeared in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe, Wired, New Scientist, Popular Science and many other publications. Billings joined Scientific American in 2014 and previously worked as a staff editor at SEED magazine. He holds a B.A. in journalism from the University of Minnesota.

More by Lee Billings

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe