U.S. Drug Approvals Plummet in 2016

Data highlight a slow year for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

US drug approvals are on track to drop by more than half in 2016 compared to 2015, according to a December 14 presentation by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The agency had approved 19 new drugs this year as of December 9, putting it on track for its lowest yearly tally since 2007. The decline is made more dramatic by 2015’s bumper crop of approvals. The FDA approved 45 new drugs last year — the highest total in nearly 20 years.

John Jenkins, director of the Office of New Drugs in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, attributed the decline to a reduction in submissions and to the speedy review of five drugs approved ahead of schedule in 2015. The agency also rejected more drugs, he noted: in 2016, 61% of the FDA’s decisions were approvals, compared to more than 95% in 2015.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The data come as the agency waits to find out who will be its next commissioner under US president-elect Donald Trump. Trump has said that he wants to speed up drug approvals and cut through “the red tape at the FDA”. And on December 13, President Barack Obama signed into law the 21st Century Cures Act, which includes measures — some of them controversial — intended to streamline drug approvals.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on December 19, 2016.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe