Jan Willem Tulp; Source: Lawrence Livemore National Laboratory (data)
Join Our Community of Science Lovers!
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
It can be tricky to resolve different tales that are told about which U.S. energy sources are growing or fading. But now we have hard numbers. Annual flowcharts from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory show that over the past decade, wind power has increased 396 percent and solar power is up 956 percent. Of course, a very small share can rise by many percentage points and still be small, but that traditional narrative about wind and solar is nearly over: together they now provide 3.48 quads (quadrillion BTU) of electricity—more than hydropower. The natural gas story is clearer, too: it has not surged “recently” but rather has grown steadily for 10 years, and this trend is the main cause of a continual decrease in coal consumption. If these trends persist, says A. J. Simon, Livermore's energy group leader, “we can expect our energy economy to continue to get cleaner.”
Credit: Jan Willem Tulp; Source: Lawrence Livemore National Laboratory (data)
Editor’s Note: This article was revised after posting to correct the online version of the illustration. The labels for “Energy lost” and “Energy put to use” had been misplaced.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
Thank you,
Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American
