Jan Willem Tulp; Source: Lawrence Livemore National Laboratory (data)
Join Our Community of Science Lovers!
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
It can be tricky to resolve different tales that are told about which U.S. energy sources are growing or fading. But now we have hard numbers. Annual flowcharts from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory show that over the past decade, wind power has increased 396 percent and solar power is up 956 percent. Of course, a very small share can rise by many percentage points and still be small, but that traditional narrative about wind and solar is nearly over: together they now provide 3.48 quads (quadrillion BTU) of electricity—more than hydropower. The natural gas story is clearer, too: it has not surged “recently” but rather has grown steadily for 10 years, and this trend is the main cause of a continual decrease in coal consumption. If these trends persist, says A. J. Simon, Livermore's energy group leader, “we can expect our energy economy to continue to get cleaner.”
Credit: Jan Willem Tulp; Source: Lawrence Livemore National Laboratory (data)
Editor’s Note: This article was revised after posting to correct the online version of the illustration. The labels for “Energy lost” and “Energy put to use” had been misplaced.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
