New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The world is falling short of—and even reversing—its health targets, WHO warns

Malaria incidence is increasing, progress on maternal mortality is stalling, and some childhood vaccine rates are plateauing or have dipped below the threshold for herd immunity

The World Health Organization’s logo on the door of its headquarters

Photo by Robert Hradil/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Global progress on health is falling short, slowing and even reversing, according to the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) 2026 World Health Statistics report. The annual check-in on progress toward the United Nations’ health goals for 2030 should be “sobering,” said Yukiko Nakatani, the WHO’s assistant director general for health systems, at a press conference on Wednesday.

Malaria incidence has increased, measles coverage remains below the threshold needed to prevent outbreaks, and maternal and child mortality decline is slowing, the report found. Excess COVID mortality between 2020 and 2023 is also far higher than official death counts suggested, according to the WHO. “We estimate approximately 22 million excess deaths globally during this period,” said Alain Labrique, the WHO’s director of digital health and innovation, at the same press conference.

The COVID pandemic completely erased nearly a decade of global gains in life expectancy and healthy life expectancy between 2019 and 2021, he said; these measures have somewhat rebounded, but progress has been uneven.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Importantly, the 2026 report includes data up to 2024, so the effect of U.S. funding cuts to foreign aid and world health initiatives and the Trump administration’s decision to pull the country from the WHO aren’t captured, Labrique said. He added, however, that “it’s quite likely that, should these trends continue, and we don’t see reinvigorated investment in global health, that this will have an effect on global health indicators and ... that it may continue to cause a reversal in the patterns that we worked so hard to gain.”

There are some positive points: alcohol and tobacco consumption decreased, continuing a downward trend since 2010. New HIV infections have fallen by 40 percent since 2010, and rates of neglected tropical diseases—a group of more than 20 infections such as dengue fever or leprosy—also fell.

WHO officials stressed that the data are incomplete. Some countries don’t report data as frequently or completely as others, and funding cuts also endanger data collection. Cuts to foreign health aid in the wake of the pandemic have also disrupted surveillance systems, Nakatani said.

The report comes just days before the start of the World Health Assembly, the annual meeting of the WHO’s decision-making body that sets the organization’s priorities and policies for the coming year.

“We need stronger health systems, sustained investment and better quality of data,” Nakatani said. “The report is an urgent reminder for member states and all health partners together: we must refocus efforts, safeguard hard-won gains and renew progress.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe