Making Things We Know Will Disappear

For those stifled by shades of perfectionism, temporary media can remind us how to create things for the fun of it

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


When kids decide to create something, a kind of magic happens – they just start creating it. They build and make and design all at once without hesitation or fear. The things break and fall down, and they just try again. Sometimes they “make” things just in the world of their imagination, creating elaborate landscapes or histories or machines or friends that never leave the world of pretend. They still throw themselves into that process without concern or shame.

But somewhere on the journey out of childhood, something happens: We start to care. We decide that, if we are going to bother to create something, it should be “good.” Or more extreme, we decide that it should be “important.” As our focus shifts from the process of creation to the final product being created, we find those eager new workmates like writer’s block and imposter syndrome waiting to welcome us. I was struck particularly early, being one of those kids who hesitated to use sticker books or color in coloring books. I became paralyzed by the risk of potential mistakes or lost hypothetical future opportunities. And as much as I love making – crocheting, drawing, building, writing – I often find myself bogged down by whether my final product will be good enough.

That is one of the reasons I love building sandcastles. It’s why I get so enthusiastic about carving pumpkins, building snowmen, coloring eggs, decorating cakes, and drawing with chalk. I am grateful for the vast landscape of creative pursuits that are, by their very nature, temporary. You know, from the moment you start, that the final product won’t last. The focus can be entirely on the creative process itself. I know there are people who have the opposite reaction – the folks who depend on that final product for motivation and look at the first spots of rot on a jack-o-lantern and think, “Why bother?” That’s fine. I don’t need to convince them to carve anything. I can still be thankful for the liberating nature of short-term projects for those of us who need that bit of freedom. I am happy to sing those praises myself.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So, cheers to non-ideal media, like playdough, for letting us laugh through a series of terrible iterations and start over without concern. May they gently remind us how bad our mental images of sharks are and our toddlers’ willingness to celebrate anything vaguely fish-shaped – all in a matter of minutes.

Hooray for forts! Because, unless you plan to spend the rest of your days in a living room with a cushion wall and propped-up sheets, any fort will ultimately have to disappear. May the joy of designing the perfect board game den or movie nook be with you all.

Cheers to using rainy days at the beach to build extravagant castles, moats, and villages in range of the tide. May we all get the chance to create a massive sand dragon and watch it slowly get used into extinction, dozens of kids riding its back until there is nothing left to ride.

Hurrah for diaries, letting us write without the need to look back or *shudder* share what we create. May we remember that putting a pen to paper can be a pleasure in its own right.

And yay for extravagant meals, which will be eaten within hours of their creation. May we enjoy the process of rolling out dough and learning to weave a lattice as much as the eating experience itself.

Here’s to all of the small projects that let us hone our skills when the stakes don’t matter and allow us to use those skills for the grander undertakings we ultimately plan to keep. Here’s to all of our Cinderella creations and the freedom they can provide – made only to last until midnight.

Amanda Baker is a science communicator and outreach advocate. She has a geoscience PhD from Cornell University and has managed open-access, academic journals as well as the outreach journal Frontiers for Young Minds. She is currently writing and editing science content for kids, from curriculum materials to magazines like Smore. She has served as a Science Olympiad national event supervisor and taught a first-year writing seminar on sustainable earth systems while at Cornell.

More by Amanda Baker

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe