Shifting Baselines: The Past and the Future of Ocean Fisheries

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


We cannot ignore the past, and to remind us of this, the present has yielded a refreshing and essential perspective on marine science in the new book Shifting Baselines: The Past and Future of Ocean Fisheries. Looking at today's data is simply not good enough, especially when the abundance of reef fish has declined 90-95% in the last 50 years, and sea turtles have declined over 99%. This book is a large discussion around 'shifting baselines' -- a term coined by Daniel Pauly (to whom the book is dedicated) that refers to a slanted view of the world due to inadequate reference points -- and includes chapters from many of the founders of marine historical ecology.

From sardines to coral reefs, from Newfoundland to intergenerational optimism -- there is a melange on scientific material on the state of the oceans. Many of the chapters have a New England element, reminding us that most trends we see in the North Atlantic -- the boom and bust of cod fishing, the invention and shortcomings of fisheries models, the rise, fall, and uncertainty in quantifying the effects of industrial whaling -- are harbingers of trends to come worldwide.

Given the diverse backgrounds of the contributors, this book gives a wide view of what the past means for the future: what cod populations really looked like, how to detect genetic bottlenecks (for instance, a population of 100 female whales loses 0.5 percent of its genetic variation every generation), why we need to write communication into scientific budgets. Editors Jeremy Jackson, Karen Alexander, and Enric Sala have tied all the threads together (full disclosure: they are friends and colleagues, as are many of the chapter authors). The book makes excellent reading for anyone or any course interested in the background and methods of historical ecology, introductory population genetics, and science communication.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe